Texas District Attorney Offices React to Stay-Home Orders
"We sent a lot of the support staff home with work to do. We've really ratcheted down the number of attorneys that we have," said Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot.
March 25, 2020 at 11:15 AM
4 minute read
Prosecutors, like many lawyers across Texas, have started working from home.
As the Lone Star State's major metropolitan areas declared stay-home orders this week, the district attorney offices in Houston and San Antonio announced that they're still performing key functions, but with limited staff in the office and many lawyers working from home. It's much the same in Dallas, which was the first Texas city to announce a stay-home order for everyone but essential workers.
"We sent a lot of the support staff home with work to do. We've really ratcheted down the number of attorneys that we have. Some of the judges are still holding court, in court, so we have to have people there, of course. The rest we are trying to do remotely," said Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot, who noted that he's still working in the office every day. "Some people have said, 'Don't go in,' but I just don't see how I can function from home. It's a 500-person office."
He said he's put a priority on working through the cases of criminal-defendants who are still in jail, have nonviolent offenses and can safely be released from detention amid the coronavirus outbreak. Prosecutors are looking especially closely at the cases of COVID-19 vulnerable defendants such as the elderly, he said.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg's office announced that her offices are closed to the public and most of her prosecutors and staff will be working remotely until further notice.
"While urging all members of the public to follow the instructions of elected leaders and health experts for social distancing and other actions to limit the spread to the virus, I am ensuring that some aspects of my staff's work for the public continue without interruption," District Attorney Kim Ogg said in a statement.
For example, prosecutors are still ready to conduct any court setting that a judge schedules through video conference. Remote appearances will be the norm until further notice.
Most prosecutors are also home in San Antonio. Bexar County District Attorney Joe Gonzales noted in a statement that some of his staff are necessary to seek protective orders, appear at magistrations, present to grand juries, review new arrest cases and appear at limited court hearings.
But prosecutors will no longer meet face-to-face with victims and witnesses. Instead, they'll talk about cases over the phone. The office is asking people who need protective orders to call ahead or fill out an online intake form. If they meet legal standards, they can make an appointment to visit the DA's office to sign a sworn affidavit.
"In the last week, we have reduced our staffing in an effort to limit face-to-face contact and prevent the spread of COVID-19. Now, in a stricter move to protect our staff and the community, we have no choice but to do what most are being asked to do: stay home. Even with a limited staff, our focus continues to be the safety of our community," Gonzales said.
It's much the same in Dallas, said an email by Kim Leach, spokeswoman of the Dallas County District Attorney's office.
"We are working with limited staff with the majority of employees working from home," Leach said.
No one from the district attorney's offices in either Tarrant or Travis counties returned a message seeking comment before deadline.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
2 Judges: Meet the New Chief Justice and the GC Who Just Rose to the Bench
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250