Texas District Attorney Offices React to Stay-Home Orders
"We sent a lot of the support staff home with work to do. We've really ratcheted down the number of attorneys that we have," said Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot.
March 25, 2020 at 11:15 AM
4 minute read
Prosecutors, like many lawyers across Texas, have started working from home.
As the Lone Star State's major metropolitan areas declared stay-home orders this week, the district attorney offices in Houston and San Antonio announced that they're still performing key functions, but with limited staff in the office and many lawyers working from home. It's much the same in Dallas, which was the first Texas city to announce a stay-home order for everyone but essential workers.
"We sent a lot of the support staff home with work to do. We've really ratcheted down the number of attorneys that we have. Some of the judges are still holding court, in court, so we have to have people there, of course. The rest we are trying to do remotely," said Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot, who noted that he's still working in the office every day. "Some people have said, 'Don't go in,' but I just don't see how I can function from home. It's a 500-person office."
He said he's put a priority on working through the cases of criminal-defendants who are still in jail, have nonviolent offenses and can safely be released from detention amid the coronavirus outbreak. Prosecutors are looking especially closely at the cases of COVID-19 vulnerable defendants such as the elderly, he said.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg's office announced that her offices are closed to the public and most of her prosecutors and staff will be working remotely until further notice.
"While urging all members of the public to follow the instructions of elected leaders and health experts for social distancing and other actions to limit the spread to the virus, I am ensuring that some aspects of my staff's work for the public continue without interruption," District Attorney Kim Ogg said in a statement.
For example, prosecutors are still ready to conduct any court setting that a judge schedules through video conference. Remote appearances will be the norm until further notice.
Most prosecutors are also home in San Antonio. Bexar County District Attorney Joe Gonzales noted in a statement that some of his staff are necessary to seek protective orders, appear at magistrations, present to grand juries, review new arrest cases and appear at limited court hearings.
But prosecutors will no longer meet face-to-face with victims and witnesses. Instead, they'll talk about cases over the phone. The office is asking people who need protective orders to call ahead or fill out an online intake form. If they meet legal standards, they can make an appointment to visit the DA's office to sign a sworn affidavit.
"In the last week, we have reduced our staffing in an effort to limit face-to-face contact and prevent the spread of COVID-19. Now, in a stricter move to protect our staff and the community, we have no choice but to do what most are being asked to do: stay home. Even with a limited staff, our focus continues to be the safety of our community," Gonzales said.
It's much the same in Dallas, said an email by Kim Leach, spokeswoman of the Dallas County District Attorney's office.
"We are working with limited staff with the majority of employees working from home," Leach said.
No one from the district attorney's offices in either Tarrant or Travis counties returned a message seeking comment before deadline.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.