Texas Bar Executive Committee Approves COVID-19 Emergency Resolution at Historic Remote Meeting
The State Bar of Texas' executive committee on Thursday approved a resolution granting Executive Director Trey Apffel with more authority to respond quickly to the COVID-19 crisis.
March 26, 2020 at 02:43 PM
3 minute read
For the first time in history, the executive committee of the State Bar of Texas met virtually though video conference to handle its business.
Driven online by the coronavirus, the meeting—interrupted at times with questions like "are you there?" and reminders to "take yourself off mute"—included numerous agenda items dealing with the pandemic, including the approval of a resolution granting Executive Director Trey Apffel with more authority to respond to the crisis.
"The executive director should be empowered to take extraordinary measures during the COVID-19 emergency to continue the operations of the State Bar and provide services to its constituents," said the resolution, which the committee passed unanimously.
Under the measure, Apffel will be able to call emergency meetings of the bar board and executive committee, and to suspend provisions, deadlines, penalties and assessments in the bar's board policy manual. Apffel also can make expenditures from bar reserves to keep up the bar's business, operations and services, and take other actions he deems necessary or prudent to maintain the bar's operations through the crisis.
Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lehrmann, the court's liaison to the bar, asked attorneys and judges to inform the bar or the Texas Office of Court Administration about the legal issues coming up from the virus. The court is meeting daily and wants to take action to protect Texans, she said.
"Together, we are going to make this work," Lehrmann said.
During the meeting Apffel told board members that all of the bar's staff members are now working remotely, still taking care of the bar's essential services. He thanked the bar's information technology staff for launching remote operations seamlessly.
"Everything is operating smoothly and efficiently," said Apffel.
Chief Disciplinary Counsel Seana Willing reported that her assistant disciplinary counsel are all working from home, too. The Texas Supreme Court issued an emergency order suspending disciplinary case deadlines because of the pandemic, she noted, and her 95 staff members have been calling respondent attorneys and their counsel to work and cooperate with them as much as possible.
The bar will be relying on more Zoom video conferences in many ways, from meetings of the Commission on Lawyer Discipline to its April 7 board meeting to a method of voting in the next chair of the board on April 7.
Immediate past president Joe Longley said the bar should keep track of the cost savings from holding the meetings remotely.
"We are in historic times. By doing this through video, it may be in the future, we can do more bar meetings like this," he said.
But President Randy Sorrels said there's value in meeting in person, compared with looking at screens.
"I can guarantee you there is a cost savings," he said. "But is it a benefit? I can't guarantee you."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250