Brooklyn Photographer Alleges Infowars Infringed His Jeffrey Epstein Death Photo
The complaint filed Thursday, alleging copyright infringement over a Jeffrey Epstein image, joins a growing number of litigation against the Texas-based Infowars.
March 27, 2020 at 12:04 PM
3 minute read
Infowars faces new litigation by a Brooklyn photographer who photographed emergency medical technicians at a hospital who were trying to revive Jeffrey Epstein after he died by suicide in jail.
The complaint filed Thursday joins a growing number of litigation against the Texas-based Infowars, which also faces cases in Texas and Connecticut over its founder, Alex Jones' reporting that the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School was a hoax.
New York copyright litigator Richard Liebowitz represents plaintiff William Farrington in this new lawsuit, Farrington v. Infowars, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.
"News and political companies must get authorization from the photographer before using photographs on their websites," Liebowitz, of the Liebowitz Law Firm in Valley Stream, New York, wrote in an email. "Photographers have a right to get paid for their photos and are able to enforce their rights against those who do not seek the proper permissions."
Farrington alleged in the complaint that he's a professional photographer who shot the Epstein photo and owns the copyright to the work. He licensed the image to the New York Post for an Aug. 10, 2019, article.
The same day, Infowars published an article about Epstein's death, and the site used one of Farrington's photograph, the complaint alleged.
Read the complaint:
|"InfoWars did not license the photograph from plaintiff for its article, nor did Infowars have plaintiff's permission or consent to publish the photograph on its website," the complaint said, adding that the site didn't give a photo credit to Farrington.
The photographer, bringing copyright infringement and related claims, is suing Infowars for damages and the defendant's profits, or for statutory damages of up to $175,000. He also wants to recover costs and attorney fees.
One Texas lawsuit that Infowars and Jones are facing alleges another type of impropriety using photographs.
Pending in Texas state court in Austin, the case, Fontaine v. Jones, involves a man suing Jones and Infowars for falsely publishing his photo and saying he was the gunman in the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Austin's Third Court of Appeals ruled in October 2019 that the claim could proceed.
Robert Barnes, founder of Barnes Law in Los Angeles, and the outside general counsel for Infowars, didn't immediately return an email seeking comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn AI Danger to Minors: Two Texas Families Want to Shut Down Character.AI
4 minute readTexas Bitcoin Mining Execs Sued for Alleged ‘Deception and Brazen Self-Dealing’
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250