Thousands Less: These Numbers Show How COVID-19 Affected Texas Courts, Lawyers
An analysis of civil filings in Texas state courts shows that the number of filings has dropped steadily each week during the month of March, as the coronavirus has spread across the Lone Star State.
March 30, 2020 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The number of civil filings dropped steadily in March as the coronavirus shut down Texas courts, and many lawyers started working from home.
In past years, the number of week-by-week civil filings in March has stayed relatively the same—but not this time.
This month: a steady week-by-week decline in filings. And while data showed a steady increase in cases coming into civil courts in recent years, this March saw a steep drop.
The reason: COVID-19, according Jennifer Doan, chairwoman of the litigation section of the State Bar of Texas. And the main reason is because lawyers are human.
"In the last couple of weeks, really since the beginning of the month, their lives have been turned upside down," said Doan, a partner in Haltom & Doan in Texarkana.
As attorneys care for children during the virus outbreak, and juggle work-from-home duties, getting to the courthouse to file lawsuits might not be on the top of their minds, Doan said.
"It's challenging to be productive, when there are greater concerns that need to be addressed immediately," she said.
Texas Lawyer researched civil filing numbers on re:SearchTX, the Texas courts' document-retrieval system, to look at week-by-week filings in March and compare them to the same time frames in past years.
|
Interactive chart: Place your cursor over the chart to view actual numbers.
Source: re:SearchTX. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
Filings have dropped steadily every week: In the first week of the month, there were about 7,500 filings, in the second week there were 6,700, in the third week there were 6,600 and in the fourth week, only 4,700 filings came in. The steady decline is much different than in past years, when roughly the same number of filings came in during all four weeks of March.
Another trend emerged by comparing week-by-week filings in 2017, 2018 and 2019. In earlier years, a clear trend of the civil filings climbing steadily over time, but then this year, a steep decline.
For example, in the first week of March, court data show 20% fewer filings than the first week of March 2019. In the second week, litigants filed 30% fewer civil cases than the same time one year earlier. And the third week of March this year brought 31% fewer filings compared with last year. The trend continued in the final week of the month, with 51% fewer filings at the end of March 2020, compared to the same time in 2019.
The number of civil filings during the fourth week of March this year was lower than it's been in years, dipping 35% below the same period in 2017.
"So many of our practices depend on face-to-face meetings with clients," said State Bar of Texas president-elect Larry McDougal. "We're not having those any more."
Some attorneys who don't have the technology to work remotely from home have simply closed down their practices temporarily, McDougal explained. Other counsel are setting up work-from-home practices.
"We are all on a learning curve right now," McDougal said.
Doan, the Texas Bar litigation chairwoman, said that the litigation decrease is temporary, not permanent. She expects the numbers to rise again in May or June, or perhaps take longer, if social distancing remains in place into the summer.
"I don't think it is a permanent issue," she said. "Historically, when there's a downturn in the economy, more companies and individuals resort to litigation."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250