A Conservative Houston Lawyer is Saying the COVID-19 Stay-Home Order Violates Rights
"I do have a passion for religious liberty and a passion for individuals being able to freely worship," said Jared Woodfill, founding partner in Woodfill Law Firm in Houston. "I think it's a sacred right."
March 31, 2020 at 02:41 PM
4 minute read
Houston lawyer Jared Woodfill, no stranger to controversial cases, is at it again with a legal challenge claiming Harris County's COVID-19 stay-home order violates religious liberty rights.
Woodfill has made headlines in the past by fighting against Houston's LGBT anti-discrimination ordinance and objecting to the city granting benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees.
This time, he represents three pastors and a conservative activist, Dr. Steven Hotze, who take issue with the fact that the county's stay-home order says churches can't hold in-person services, but may do video or telephone services. Violating the order can bring a $1,000 fine and jail time.
"The circumstances presented by coronavirus do not excuse unlawful government infringements upon freedom," said a petition for writ of mandamus filed with the Texas Supreme Court on Monday. "The free exercise of religion cannot be taken lightly and should not be sacrificed at the altar of political expediency."
The petition claimed that the respondent, Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, has usurped judicial power and grossly abused her discretion to void the First and Second Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
"Who would have thought in Harris County, in our America, there would be a time and day the big hand of government—in this case, one county judge—sent [the Houston Police Department] out there to stop a pastor from exercising his First Amendment rights," Woodfill said.
But Robert Soard, first assistant to Harris County Attorney Vince Ryan, said the stay-home order was narrowly tailored to respond to the coronavirus crisis.
"This is probably something that's never happened in the nation of the United States, where every state in the union is facing the same problems," Soard said. "These are extraordinary remedies to meet extraordinary challenges."
He added that under the stay-home order, churches can continue doing everything as before, but it must be done virtually. That restriction is reasonable and rational considering the seriousness of the crisis, Soard added.
The petitioners haven't brought claims in a trial court, but instead, are invoking the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, arguing their dispute is very time-sensitive and they're facing serious harm.
But Woodfill has a two-part legal strategy. Separately, he's planning to file lawsuits in trial courts to challenge stay-home orders in Montgomery and Galveston counties.
Woodfill said he believes that religious leaders and their congregations should not face the "heavy hand of government" banning in-person worship services. If allowed to hold services, pastors will do what's socially responsible and best for congregations. Even before stay-home orders emerged, some churches had already been moving services online. Even churches in areas that still have no stay-home orders have been imposing social distancing restrictions, he added.
"They are good citizens," Woodfill said.
Read the petition:
Anti-LGBT Advocacy
Woodfill, who used to be chairman of the Harris County Republican Party, has a history of bringing religious-liberty challenges Houston-area laws about LGBT rights and same-sex marriage.
Back in 2015, Woodfill was the trial attorney who represented a group of plaintiffs who succeeded in undoing the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance, which banned discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment, housing and city contracting.
In another case, Pidgeon v. Hicks, Woodfill challenged Houston's policy of granting benefits to same-sex spouses of city employees. Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruled same-sex marriage was a constitutional right in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Texas Supreme Court nevertheless ruled that Woodfill's plaintiffs could move forward in suing the city.
He said his Christian faith is the guiding force in his life.
"I do have a passion for religious liberty and a passion for individuals being able to freely worship," said Woodfill, founding partner in Woodfill Law Firm. "I think it's a sacred right."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250