Texas Attorney Disbarred for Forging Judge's Signature, 21 Others Also Disciplined
The most severe sanction on the April attorney discipline list was the disbarment of an Abilene attorney, who was dishonest with a client by giving her "a fraudulent order and forged signature of a judge."
April 01, 2020 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
Forging a judge's signature on a fraudulent order brought disbarment for Abilene personal injury attorney Majd Ghanayem, one of the 22 lawyers whose sanctions were released publicly on Wednesday.
Aside from Ghanayem, 21 other attorneys who were disciplined for professional misconduct are included on the latest disciplinary actions list by the State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel. They faced 26 total sanctions—two lawyers got multiples—including one disbarment, nine suspension, three public reprimands and 13 private reprimands.
Ghanayem got three law license suspensions for misconduct with other clients, too, but his most severe sanction—disbarment—came from his 2015 representation of a woman in an action for involuntary relinquishment of parental rights against the biological father of her son.
Ghanayem neglected the matter and didn't file the petition until 2017. He also was dishonest by misrepresenting the matter to the client and giving her "a fraudulent order and forged signature of a judge," the judgment of disbarment said.
That wasn't the only fraudulent document that came from Ghanayem. The judgment in one of Ghanayem's suspensions, for neglecting a divorce case, said he submitted a fabricated email to the Texas Bar when he responded to the grievance.
Financial mismanagement was at play in two other suspensions. One judgment said Ghanayem, who didn't return a call or email seeking comment before deadline, received a client's funds but failed to notify her or give her the money promptly. Another judgment said Ghanayem went against a client's choice about settlement, settled the case without consent, submitted her forged signature to the insurance company, and then failed to notify the client or deliver the funds to her promptly.
Here are details on the other attorneys who received sanctions.
- Patrick Cameron Murray of Lubbock received a partially probated suspension for neglect of matters, failure to communicate with clients, failure to returned unearned fees and not responding to grievances, said his judgment.
- David Saenz of McAllen received two fully probated suspensions for failing to supervise the conduct of his nonlawyer employee. One judgment said a personal injury client got an unsolicited call and visit about signing a contingency fee contract from Saenz's employee. The second judgment contained similar allegations.
- Ronald T. Spriggs of Amarillo received a fully probated suspension for taking an unreasonable position in a criminal case that drove up costs, created other burdens, and delayed resolution of the case, his judgment said.
- Everto A. Villarreal of Edinburg received a fully probated suspension for neglecting a medical-malpractice matter, and allowing the statute of limitations to run before communicating to the client, among other things, the judgment said.
- Marc Elliot Villarreal of Corpus Christi received a partially probated suspension for using settlement funds from one client to pay out settlement funds to a different client, his judgment said. In a March 6 judgment, which came in too late for publication on the April discipline list, his law license was suspended for one year and on probation for four years for other trust account violations.
- The list also included public reprimands against Javier Aguierre of Brownsville, Richard Contreras of El Paso and George B. Tennant Jr. of Pearland.
- Thirteen other attorneys received private reprimands.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250