Houston Lawyers Demand Judges End In-Person Appearances Amid COVID-19 Outbreak
"Nobody has dealt with this before," said 174th District Judge Hazel Jones. "We don't have all the right answers. And yes, it does take people to say, 'Hey, maybe you should do it another way.'"
April 14, 2020 at 05:55 PM
3 minute read
Judges in Houston who are allegedly still requiring lawyers and defendants to make in-person court appearances amid the COVID-19 outbreak have found a new critic.
The Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association, which counts 700 members, demanded that criminal judges stop forcing in-person appearances from defendants and their attorneys. It claimed the same courts have been allowing prosecutors to appear by video conference.
"This is a reality down at the courthouse and the risk is very real," said Neal Davis, the association's president. "We are very concerned about our members' health, and the health of the defendants, and everyone else in the city."
The association has joined the push against judges forcing in-person appearances a week after former Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Elsa Alcala slammed three specific Harris County district judges for their practices.
|Read more: Ex-Judge Slams Houston Criminal Judges for Forcing In-Person Appearances Amid COVID-19 Spread
One of them, Judge Hazel Jones of the 174th Criminal District Court, said she's open to listening to constructive criticism, and changing her practices, because she wants to do what is in the best interests of Harris County citizens.
Jones noted that her court is increasingly using video and teleconferences to do court business. She's reset most bond cases, and now conducts only first hearings for defendants who just bonded out of jail, and plea hearings for incarcerated defendants.
"Nobody has dealt with this before," Jones said. "It's a fluid situation. We don't have all the right answers. And yes, it does take people to say, 'Hey, maybe you should do it another way.' That's fine."
|Risky situation
In a letter on Monday, the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association argued that in addition to endangering people's lives, some judges are creating an appearance of impropriety. They claim that when judges allow prosecutors to appear electronically, but require the defense to appear in person, this creates a threat to key legal principles requiring the court to treat all parties equally.
The letter went to 22 criminal district judges and 16 criminal county court-at-law judges in Harris County. The association noted that most criminal judges are not requiring defendants on bond to make appearances. The courts are automatically resetting cases. The association applauded those judges and their court coordinators. The remaining courts should follow them, the letter said.
"More than ten inmates per court are still being brought unnecessarily to the courthouse every day the courts operate. Defense counsel must meet with inmates in the courtroom holding cells, needlessly and recklessly exposing these lawyers to the risk of COVID-19," said the letter, which added that social distancing is impossible. "When defense lawyers or defendants leave the holding area and enter the courtroom, they expose the judge, court staff and deputies. Large groups of defendants and counsel are left for hours in the hallways."
Judge Randy Roll of the 179th Criminal District Court, who received the association's letter, wrote in an email that he agrees wholeheartedly. If prosecutors can appear by Zoom, so should defense counsel, he wrote. Roll added that he's handling business by telephone, too.
He said, "My policy is we do not need defendants coming in to the courtroom on bond or standing in the hall mingling with those others in the hall."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 2Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 3Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 4Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 5De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250