Lawyer Ethics in the Age of COVID-19
While America was on the verge of a revolution, Thomas Paine wrote, "... these are the times that try men's souls." Isn't that the truth today…
April 15, 2020 at 04:39 PM
3 minute read
While America was on the verge of a revolution, Thomas Paine wrote, "… these are the times that try men's souls." Isn't that the truth today as well? But these are also the times that put a person's soul on trial. Temptation to be unethical is greatest when times are as bad as they are now. Here though are cognitive hacks to help others, and yourself, stay on the straight and narrow.
Have a troubled seeming friend or colleague? Want to find out what is going on with her? Do not ask if everything is OK. Why? A rote question produces a rote response. Instead ask, in a conversational tone, "What's on your mind?" You might need to ask several times, but the invitation will finally be accepted and the truth forthcoming.
The truth is often self-generated—try this hack from, "Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die," by Chip and Dan Heath when you believe a colleague is thinking of cutting ethical corners, cheating others and avoiding responsibilities. The hack is based on a quote from Abraham Lincoln about the "better angels of our nature." Let's say a colleague, under pressure to meet billing quotas, tells you she plans to use to use a "heavy pen" (a euphemistic phrase for billing hours that were not worked). Tell the colleague, "Lola, I know you are the kind of lawyer that values your hard-earned reputation and would never do anything to corrupt it." What then goes through Lola's mind? She thinks, "You know, I am that kind of lawyer," and then asks herself, "What would a lawyer like me do in a situation like this?" Ultimately, she concludes, "I am the kind of lawyer that does not inflate a client's bill because of extraordinary circumstances or even normal ones."
There are other tools in the cognitive tool belt. Here is one where you help another imagine the future consequences of a present action. Let's say in the craziness and disorder of present times a colleague is retained to defend an age and disability discrimination case. Before he files an answer, he flips through the client file and sees a memo on which employee should be terminated in a reduction in force. The 67-year-old plaintiff's name is on the list—in fact, it is highlighted—along with her age which is circled, her health issues which are listed, and her retirement eligibility, which is detailed. The lawyer tells you he is going to shred the document, "It is not under subpoena or a discovery request and I am free to do so. Heck, we have not even filed an answer yet." Your choice: be the ethics police ("No, that is wrong!") or use prospective hindsight ("Let's imagine that you shred. Later the client testifies in a deposition that he created a document listing these factors but it was destroyed per our lawyer's counsel. Now let's imagine we are standing in front of a federal judge explaining this decision." Opting for the first option generates resistance while opting for the second option generates self-enlightenment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250