Five Texas Firms Hold Steady or Fall Behind in 2020 Am Law 100
Three of the five Texas firms improved their gross revenue in 2019, compared with 2018, while the other two saw a decline.
April 21, 2020 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
Revenue increased in 2019 at three of the five Texas firms on the 2020 Am Law 100, but none of the five gained any ground in the rankings, even as overall revenue growth for the country's largest 100 law firms by revenue slowed.
Gross revenue grew by 5% for the 100 highest-grossing U.S. firms in 2019, increasing to a record-setting $104 billion, and 86 of the 100 firms reported gains in gross revenue in 2019. Kirkland & Ellis again topped the chart with gross revenue of $4.154 billion, up 10.6% from the prior year.
Texas firms Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Vinson & Elkins, Baker Botts, Locke Lord, and Haynes and Boone are on the 2020 Am Law 100. The same five Texas firms made the list last year.
Two of them, Akin Gump and Vinson & Elkins, are among the 30 "Super Rich" firms that posted revenue per lawyer in excess of $1.1 million in 2019 and profits per lawyer of more than $500,000.
Akin Gump is 34th on the 2020 Am Law 200 chart, with revenue of $1.135 billion for 2019, an improvement of 5.9% compared with 2018. It dropped down from 30th last year.
Vinson & Elkins' ranking was unchanged from last year, at 55th, with $792.6 million in gross revenue for 2019, up 6.1% from 2018.
The same was true for Baker Botts, which maintained its ranking of 58th. The firm's gross revenue came in at $751.1 million, an improvement of 10.7% from the year before.
Locke Lord dropped to 76th, from 72nd the prior year. The firm's revenue was $496.4 million in 2019, a decrease of 3.1% when compared with the prior year.
Rounding out the Texas firms on the latest Am Law 100 ranking is Haynes and Boone, which came in at 94th, a drop from 92nd the year before. Gross revenue at the firm was $404.3 million, a 1% decline from the prior year.
Akin Gump led the Texas pack in revenue per lawyer, tied for 27th among Am Law 100 firms with $1.247 million. Vinson & Elkins was next in 31st place, with $1.208 million in RPL, followed by Baker Botts in the 50th spot with $1.023 million. Locke Lord's RPL came in at 73rd, at $812,000, and Haynes and Boone took 79th, with $777,000 in RPL.
The most profitable Texas firm, looking at profits per equity partner, was Vinson & Elkins at $2.798 million in 2019, coming in at 27th nationally. Akin Gump was next, taking the 30th spot, with $2.599 million in PEP, followed by Baker Botts in 52nd with $1.603 million. Haynes and Boone was 78th, with $1.008 million in PEP, while Locke Lord was 83rd with $935,000.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250