Houston Law Firm Sues Its Bank Over Small Business Loan Process
"We are in the same position as everyone else here. Why not take the lead?" said Alfonso Kennard, managing shareholder of Kennard Law in Houston.
April 21, 2020 at 09:35 PM
4 minute read
Alleging he has been left in the dark about the status of his small law firm's Paycheck Protection Program loan, a Houston lawyer is suing his bank, and two others on behalf of his small business clients.
Alfonso Kennard Jr. filed the class action lawsuit on Monday against Frost Bank, alleging it failed to process or properly submit his firm's PPP application and prioritized "select customers and 'bigger businesses.'"
"Defendant made misrepresentations to many small business owners that they would assist them with the PPP loan applications and submit them for approval," Kennard Law alleged in the suit.
Kennard focuses on employment law, general litigation and small business matters. According to the firm's petition, filed in State District Court in Harris County, it applied for $160,000 in funding through the PPP on April 3, the first day applications were accepted by the Small Business Administration. But, the firm alleged, Frost Bank has not provided any information about the loan's status.
Kennard said in an interview on Tuesday that he knows his 15-employee firm isn't alone. Contacted by other small businesses in Texas also wondering about the status of their loan applications, Kennard filed two similar class actions in state district courts on Monday—one against Chase Bank in Dallas County and against BBVA in Bexar County.
While his clients do not currently include other Texas law firms, Kennard said he is confident some will seek to be class members.
"Everyone I've been talking to has the same story without fail. There's a lot of folks who are really upset, and I don't blame them," he said.
In the Harris County suit, Kennard Law alleged that, after filing the application on April 3, it heard nothing more from Frost Bank until April 12, when a banker informed Alfonso Kennard that he had "no idea" what was happening with the loan process and that he had no information on the firm's loan. By April 16, the petition alleged, the banker could only confirm the loan application had been processed but had no further information.
By that time, the $349 billion in stimulus money Congress had earmarked for the PPP had run out. Congress is working on legislation that would add money to the program.
Kennard Law Firm brought fraud and fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and negligence causes of action against Frost Bank and alleged that the bank violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act.
Plaintiff Zamora-Orduna Realty Group brought the same causes of action against BBVA in the Bexar County suit, and in Dallas County plaintiffs Starwalk of Dallas and Kona-Wood Houston brought the same against Chase Bank. The plaintiffs and class members in each suit are seeking up to $10 million in damages, the maximum amount any small business can receive in PPP loans.
A spokesman for Frost Bank in San Antonio said the bank has not been served with a copy of the suit and declined to comment beyond court filings. A spokesman for BBVA in San Antonio said the bank does not comment on pending litigation.
A spokesman for Chase in Texas declined to comment on the allegations but provided information from the bank's website that stated it did not prioritize larger commercial banking customers over smaller businesses when working on PPP applications.
Kennard said the situation is frustrating, because no one at Frost Bank—his bank for more than a year—can tell him what's going on with his loan application. He said the money would come in handy, because his firm, like many businesses, is feeling the effects of the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus.
"I have kept every single person on payroll. I haven't reduced anyone's pay. No layoffs, and daily I see the largest firms in the country are constantly furloughing, laying off, those things. I made a conscious decision to not do those things," he said.
Because his firm does employment litigation and work for small businesses, it felt right to file suit over issues with the government stimulus program.
"We are in the same position as everyone else here. Why not take the lead?" Kennard said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250