No Court Until June? Texas Judicial Agency Urges Ban of In-Person Proceedings
The Texas Office of Court Administration has recommended that Texas courts delay in-person proceedings of any size until June 1, in a new guidance document for courts.
April 22, 2020 at 05:17 PM
2 minute read
Texas lawyers might not be getting back into courthouses until at least June 1.
The Texas Office of Court Administration has recommended that Texas courts delay in-person proceedings of any size until June, in a new guidance document for courts.
Emergency orders by the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals have already prohibited courts from conducing proceedings in nonessential cases that would bring together gatherings that violate maximum group-size limits. And the high courts have instead encouraged the use video and telephone hearings.
Now, the office's latest guidance document said that courts should only do in-person proceedings if they cannot hold video or telephonic meetings. Administrative Director David Slayton didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
The guidance said that even when the courts have to do in-person proceedings, they shouldn't let more than 10 people gather in or around the courtroom, and they should follow social-distancing guidelines. Courts should require attendees to wear face coverings, too, the guidance said.
"No non-essential proceedings should be held in-person," the document said, adding that there's no limit on using remote proceedings to handle those matters.
The administrative office plans to release further guidance about whether teleworking employees can start working in the courthouses again, and how courts should start handling in-person proceedings as soon as government orders allow them again, it said.
Some courts have changed their emergency orders to follow the administrative office's new guidance.
Judge Emily Miskel of Collin County's 470th District Court tweeted on Tuesday that the district courts in her county withdrew their previous COVID-19 orders and would be following the guidance.
Collin County District Courts have withdrawn our previous Joint Statements Regarding Health & Safety Concerns and will be following the guidance published by OCA: https://t.co/NnBqdZ91KF pic.twitter.com/koWmEWn67D
— Judge Emily Miskel (@emilymiskel) April 21, 2020
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250