Shared Custody in the Time of COVID-19: A Q&A With Susan Myres
Texas Lawyer had the chance to speak recently with Houston attorney Susan Myres, president of the AAML, about shared custody and the challenges divorced/separated parents face during the time of COVID-19.
April 29, 2020 at 07:18 PM
8 minute read
Divorced/separated parents sharing custody of children during the COVID-19 pandemic face special challenges for parenting, according to the leaders of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) and the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC).
As the pandemic has become more complex and prolonged, the AAML has explored this subject in depth with its new publication, "19 Tips for Parenting During COVID-19," directed at parents sharing custody during this crisis. The guidelines are divided into three sections: For Parents, For Parents and Children, and Taking Care of Yourself.
Texas Lawyer had the chance to speak recently with Houston attorney Susan Myres, president of the AAML, about shared custody and the challenges divorced/separated parents face during the time of COVID-19.
During this unprecedented crisis, must court orders still be followed to the letter?
Susan Myres: Many jurisdictions have mandated that court orders regarding custody be followed as closely as possible. If parents are supposed to transition the children from one parent to the other after school, for instance, they should attempt to continue to follow that timetable even when the schools are closed. However, we are all in an unprecedented situation. Obviously, some rules in some parents' situations will have to bend. Parents should begin with a general expectation that they will follow the court orders and then address only those circumstances that are really unusual.
What if one parent is a medical staffer or firefighter working in the thick of the crisis? Should the children be kept away from this parent for the duration? What if a parent has a more peripheral, but still eye-of-the-storm job, such as postal worker or food deliverer? What if one parent simply thinks the other is being careless about possibly exposing the children to the virus?
Making a decision as to how dangerous it might be to allow a child to visit a parent who is a medical worker or firefighter—or grocery store clerk or pharmacist—is going to be a matter of cautionary parental judgment. The welfare of children has to come first, of course, before all other considerations. Parents should make every effort to come to an amicable agreement to change court orders temporarily under these trying circumstances, and then should carefully document their agreement. If they cannot agree, they can seek virtual assistance from a mediator, therapist or lawyer. But both should bear in mind that, if there is a court hearing eventually, the parent who withheld the child will have to fully justify the decision and not be seen as someone who simply took advantage of the situation to keep the child away from the other parent. Using COVID-19 as a tool to prevent visitation will have serious consequences for the perpetrator. Ideally, parents should create an agreed-upon protocol for both homes covering hygiene, transparency, rules to follow for social distancing and the like. Children need consistency. Having the same rules in both households goes a long way towards achieving that comfortable consistency. Clearly some parents will be more concerned about protective measures than others. When in doubt, parents should seek guidance from a professional. For example, if a child has documented respiratory issues, a pediatrician may suggest temporary cessation of visits during the worst period of the pandemic.
If a parent is forced to stay away from the children for a time, how much extra makeup time with the children is reasonable afterward? The entire summer?
The parent who had more time with the child while the other parent had less because of virus conditions should try to be generous in allowing the other parent extra "makeup" time with the child when this is all over. However, a demand to keep the child for the entire summer as recompense will probably be considered excessive—unless, of course, the pandemic and staying-at-home orders continue for months!
What can be done to mitigate the time away from the non-custodial parent and from grandparents?
Now is the time for parents to be as creative as possible! Children and absent parents or grandparents can still spend time together on Skype, Zoom, Go to Meeting or FaceTime. Electronic visits cannot replace in-person hugs and time together. But they are better than just a phone call and certainly better than nothing. Both parents should go the extra mile to make electronic time meaningful for the children. They can read the same books, sing the same songs and play the same games together. Children can display the artwork, Lego projects or other achievements they have pursued during the virus. They can come up with a riddle or a brainteaser and give the parent or grandparent a day or night to find an answer. There are lots of ways to stay close without being physically next to each other.
On the other hand, what if one parent is having to take on extra shifts or put in longer hours, even working at home, and needs to have the children for a shorter period of time than usual?
Please see the answer to the second question.
What if a parent paying child support loses his job or has to close her business, and can no longer manage to pay the court-ordered child support?
If a parent has lost his job or her business has closed, the parent paying child support should file a request for an adjustment as quickly as possible, even if the courts can't respond any time soon and even if the parent requesting the change eventually drops the request. It's important to go on the record explaining and documenting a radically changed financial situation to justify a modification of child support, so the parent making payments doesn't end up having to cover hefty arrears later. If the parent was having child support garnished from his or her salary and has now lost his job and has no salary, that does not automatically relieve her of the responsibility to pay child support. In many cases these days, the parent receiving the child support has also lost a job or otherwise has less income than before, and the child still needs to eat every day! The parent asking for a reduction should still pay something if at all possible; the parent receiving support should try to be understanding under the circumstances.
What do parents do if they simply cannot arrive at a mutually satisfactory agreement on changing custody protocols during the time of the coronavirus?
Please see the answer to the second question.
What could happen if a parent refuses to follow the court order for possession? What if that parent is using the pandemic to keep the child away from the other parent?
If a judge determines that a parent did use the pandemic as an excuse to keep the child from the other parent more than was really necessary, that parent could be held in contempt, ordered to provide prime makeup time, suffer a permanent change in the periods of possession, and, in egregious cases, lose custody. Judges want the primary parent to openly and strongly encourage a good relationship with the other parent.
What if the visitation was supposed to be supervised and the locations for supervision have been closed? What can be done to continue some access?
If visitation was supposed to be supervised and all the locations for supervision have been closed, this could be another occasion for creative virtual visitation as described in #4. There is no need to cut the child off completely from any contact with the other parent during a pandemic that could last for weeks or months.
Concluding Remarks
Parents should ask themselves: At the end of this life-changing event, in the years to come, how would they want their children to tell the story to a therapist, or perhaps to grandchildren? Humans who are in a place of deep fear and uncertainty tend to go to one extreme or the other: they react selfishly and irresponsibly, or generously and honorably. Either way, children will see and remember. Parental behavior during this plague will not only affect how the child remembers his parents, but also how the child herself behaves in in similar crises.
Susan Myres is a board-certified family law attorney at Myres & Associates. She has been practicing in Houston for over 35 years and has served in leadership positions locally, statewide and nationally. She is also the current president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250