Amidst COVID-19 Uncertainty, Texas Bar Cancels Largest CLE Gathering of the Year
"It's putting common sense and safety first and foremost, and I'm not sure anybody is going to disagree with that," said State Bar of Texas President Randy Sorrels about cancelling the bar's annual meeting in June.
May 01, 2020 at 12:16 PM
3 minute read
The State Bar of Texas announced Friday it's made the difficult decision to cancel the 2020 annual meeting planned for June.
The bar took into account the health and safety of its staff, lawyers, speakers and exhibitors when it pulled the plug on the agency's largest gathering, which was planned for June 25-26 in Dallas at the Hilton Anatole.
"It's putting common sense and safety first and foremost, and I'm not sure anybody is going to disagree with that," said State Bar of Texas President Randy Sorrels.
Bar spokeswoman Amy Starnes added that it was a hard decision to cancel the event, but it was the right answer. She noted that attorneys who were registered for annual meeting will automatically get a refund. Also, the Hilton Anatole will automatically cancel their hotel reservations without attorneys having to take action. However, anyone who booked a different hotel will be responsible for canceling his or her own reservation.
Many Texas attorneys rely upon the annual meeting to satisfy all of their minimum continuing legal education requirements for the year.
"We understand the impact," Starnes said. She added that attorneys can get CLE courses through TexasBarCLE's online offerings. Also, the state bar does want to go virtual with some annual meeting events.
"We're going to be working to offer key features of what normally is part of annual meeting in a virtual format," Starnes said. "We're going to offer, for example, the swearing-in of Larry McDougal—that's going to happen online. We're planning a key note address."
Other CLE sessions that were supposed to happen at annual meeting will also move online, said Starnes.
"We're also being flexible on MCLE reporting, because people struggle in this time to get their CLE in," added Sorrels.
He said that the state bar has already extended CLE reporting deadlines for 60 days for lawyers whose requirements were due between January and May. He added that the bar will probably extend compliance deadlines even further because of the cancellation of the annual meeting.
The bar has also released three free CLE courses that provide six hours of credit, covering topics like COVID-19 tax stimulus packages for law firms, practicing law during the pandemic and invoking force majeure clauses because of the virus.
When asked how the cancellation would impact the state bar's budget, Starnes replied there's no significant impact. Fees for sponsorships and reservations cover the expenses, which means funding doesn't come from the general budget, she explained. Also, the hotel allowed the agency to cancel with no penalties.
This is only the second time in Texas Bar history that the agency canceled its annual meeting. It started hosting the event in 1939, Starnes wrote in an email. In 1945 the bar canceled annual meeting because the federal government, pushing to conserve transportation resources for the World War II effort, had denied the bar a permit to hold a convention, Starnes explained.
"The bar held shortened annual meetings in 1943 and 1944 in an effort to conserve resources, which appears to have satisfied federal requirements at that time," Starnes said. "In lieu of holding an annual meeting in 1945, the board of directors held a joint meeting of the outgoing and incoming board members in Dallas, the hometown of the incoming president."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250