With the tough new conditions created during the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas lawyers must do anything they can to secure new clients and keep the ones they still have satisfied. A brand new study by Carson Coaching, a financial advisor coaching and resource program, may be able to provide some insight for attorneys as well.
Carson Coaching says that although fees are an important part of the conversation between financial advisor and client, a holistic menu of services and a focus on financial planning are stronger indicators of value for top advisors,
The study found that clients who believe their financial advisors provide more services and lead with planning are consistently more confident about their own retirement, and are likelier to be highly satisfied with their advisor and to believe they receive adequate value for the fee they pay.
However, many advisors in the study were not exhibiting the levels of planning and transparency that clients said provided value for cost.
"With a notable uptick in individuals reaching out to financial advisors for the first time in their lives due to the coronavirus and market upheaval, there's no better time for advisors to reexamine and adjust their value proposition and how they engage with clients," Jamie Hopkins, managing director of Carson Coaching, said in a statement.
Hopkins said some of the study's data challenged what he viewed as industry best practices. For example, value was strongly correlated with the number of interactions between an advisor and a client.
Hopkins noted that many of these interactions have had to shift to phone and videoconferencing because of social distancing efforts to combat the spread of COVID-19, indicating that in times of uncertainty human connection is critically important.
"The traditional once or twice a year reach out is simply not enough for most clients," he said.
Carson Group conducted and analyzed surveys in December among 129 advisors and more than 1,000 investors with at least $100,000 in investable assets.
|Key findings
Ninety-four percent of respondents who said they knew how their advisor was compensated felt they received adequate value, compared with only 82% who did not have that transparency.
The survey results showed that conversation around compensation increased with wealth. Three in five respondents with more than $1 million in investable assets said knowing their advisor's compensation model was extremely important, versus half of those with $100,000 to $299,000 in investable assets.
The study also found that straightforward language was important in communicating with clients. Many respondents were not clear on the meaning of "fiduciary," and were likelier to understand when their advisor used common vernacular, such as acting in their "best interest."
Long-term care and estate planning are often the last planning topics covered between an advisor and client, yet 61% of respondents with an estate plan in place reported high confidence about retirement and 74% expressed high satisfaction with their advisor.
Moreover, 65% of clients who said they had received a formal written plan from their advisor felt highly confident about retirement, compared with 54% without a written plan.
"The research shows that advisors should lead with planning if they want more satisfied clients, and they should document those plans meticulously and communicate them thoughtfully and often," Hopkins said.
"The new best practices uncovered in our study will be critical as advisors seek to reinvent their value and guide their clients forward in 2020 and beyond."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Was This Judge Too Slow? Jurist Suggests 5th Circuit Micromanages His Docket
5 minute read'Now We're Bleeding': Fidelity Accused of Choosing Profits Over Clients' Interests
5 minute readRecused: Texas Judge Steps Away From Case Amid Scrutiny of His Investments
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250