Texas Attorney Swept Up in Political Storm Over His Representation of a Jailed Dallas Salon Owner
Although he's typically an intellectual property litigator, Arlington attorney Warren Norred has found himself in the eye of a political hurricane by representing Shelley Luther, owner of Salon A La Mode in Dallas.
May 07, 2020 at 03:13 PM
4 minute read
Arlington attorney Warren Norred typically spends work days on intellectual property cases filed in federal court.
But now Norred, principal in Norred Law, has found himself in the eye of a political hurricane by representing Shelley Luther, owner of Salon A La Mode in Dallas.
The city of Dallas sued Luther for opening her salon on April 24, in violation of Dallas' COVID-19 stay-home order. The case ramped up this week when a Dallas judge jailed Luther for contempt of court because she violated that court's temporary restraining order by continuing to run her salon. Her sentence was seven days in jail and a $7,000 fine, with another $500 per day that the salon remained open, reported The Texan.
But on Thursday the Texas Supreme Court stepped in by granting an emergency motion to allow Luther's release from jail, as the court handles a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Norred.
|
Read the full petition:
Earlier this week, though, in a separate legal proceeding, the Supreme Court denied a mandamus petition by Salon a la Mode and other plaintiffs, saying they needed to file their lawsuit in a district court first. But a concurring opinion on Tuesday by Justice Jimmy Blacklock, joined by three other justices, said people should not tolerate unconstitutional orders during the pandemic.
"Those who object to these restrictions should remember they were imposed by duly elected officials, vested by statute with broad emergency powers, who must make difficult decisions under difficult circumstances," Blacklock wrote. "At the same time all of us—the judiciary, the other branches of government, and our fellow citizens—must insist that every action our governments take complies with the Constitution, especially now. If we tolerate unconstitutional government orders during an emergency, whether out of expediency or fear, we abandon the constitution at the moment we need it most."
Norred, who wasn't available for an interview because he's scheduled for three national television shows to discuss Luther's case, is no stranger to controversial cases that deal with government regulations that impact the operations of businesses, explained Annette Norred, a paralegal at the firm and also Warren's wife. He and his four-attorney firm have created a niche practice in defending businesses in civil liberties cases, she said.
"Anybody who knows Warren knows he's been passionate about freedom, liberty and that cause," Annette Norred said.
Warren Norred earned his law degree in 2007 from Texas Wesleyan University School of Law, which has since changed names to Texas A&M University School of Law. He launched Norred Law right out of law school. Before he was an attorney, Norred was an electrical engineer since 1993.
Other defense attorneys on the case include C. Chad Lampe, who works in Norred's firm, and state Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Baytown, senior attorney in Fulton Strahan Law Group in Houston.
|Getting political
The Lone Star State's Republican leaders have reacted strongly to Luther's case.
Norred himself is politically connected.
He serves on the governing body of the Texas GOP, the state Republican executive committee. He's served as pro bono counsel to the Tarrant County Republican Party, in addition to being its past precinct chair.
Gov. Greg Abbott said in a statement that jailing Luther for seven days was excessive.
"Compliance with executive orders during this pandemic is important to ensure public safety," Abbott said. "However, surely there are less restrictive means to achieving that goal than jailing a Texas mother."
Paxton's statement also objected to imprisonment.
"No Texan should face imprisonment for peacefully resisting an order that temporarily closed a lawful business and drastically limited their ability to provide for their family through no fault of their own," Paxton said.
Politics is involved now, yet it likely played no role for the judge who jailed her.
Judge Eric Moyé of Dallas County's 14th District Court, who is presiding over the case, does not play favorites and is very serious about compliance with court orders, according to an email by Steve Kardell, a Dallas employment law litigator who just finished a complex case in Moyé's court. The judge would jail anyone for intentionally violating a court order, he said.
Kardell, of Kardell Law Group in Dallas, wrote, "His treatment of the beauty salon lady is in no way different than how he treats every litigant and their lawyers in his court."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Prosecutor Builds Niche Practice in Civil Human-Trafficking Suits
5 minute readTexas Continues Crackdown on Deceptive Hotel Pricing With New Lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250