![The State Bar of Texas, Austin.](https://images.law.com/texaslawyer/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2020/04/State-Bar-of-Texas-exterior-2014-Article-202004221625.jpg)
Trade Names for Texas Law Firms Get One Step Closer to Green Light
State Bar of Texas President Randy Sorrels said the most important aspect of a proposed rule change allowing firms to go by trade names is they "can't be misleading."
May 07, 2020 at 03:21 PM
5 minute read
A controversial measure that would allow law firms to use trade names in Texas is moving forward.
On Wednesday, the State Bar of Texas Committee on Disciplinary Rules and Referenda approved a revision of Rule 7.01(c) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct that explicitly allows firms to use trade names and sent it to the bar's board of directors. The committee's decision means lawyers in the state may be able to vote on the issue next year.
"Lawyers may practice under a trade name that is not false or misleading," the proposed rule change reads. The prior rule did not permit the use of trade names.
Lewis Kinard, the chair of the CDRR, said the committee unanimously agreed to tweak the language in the rule to allow trade names that are not false or misleading. Progress of the measure is now up to the bar's board.
"If they like it, then they will send it to the Supreme Court, then petition the court to [set] a vote of the membership," said Kinard, who is also general counsel for the American Heart Association in Dallas.
According to Texas rules, the board has 120 days from submission of the proposal to approve or reject the rule change, or return it to the committee for further consideration.
Randall Sorrels, president of the State Bar of Texas, said a referendum on the trade names rule change, and other proposed rule changes, is unlikely to be scheduled until 2021 due to logistics and the disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Kinard also said he does not expect a vote until next year.
Sorrels, a partner at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz in Houston, said the proposal to allow trade names is consistent with other rules governing ethical obligations.
"It can't be misleading. That's the most important thing," Sorrels said.
The use of trade names for firms has been a controversial issue in Texas and elsewhere around the country.
In January, a Utah firm known as LawHQ filed lawsuits against Texas and eight other states, alleging that wholesale prohibitions on the use of trade names for firms is unconstitutional and should be abolished.
The Texas suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, is on hold. On March 20, U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman granted a joint motion putting the litigation in abeyance because Texas is considering the rule amendment that would make the lawsuit moot.
Rebecca Evans, general counsel of LawHQ in Salt Lake City, did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.
The proposed revisions to Rule VII, which regulates communications lawyers make to obtain professional employment, have been years in the making.
The CDRR has been working on a package of proposed changed to Rule VII since 2018, and a few months ago it sent a recommendation to the bar board, which included a rule maintaining the prohibition against trade names.
But in January, the bar board voted to return the proposal to the committee for additional consideration, specifically related to the possibility of amending the proposed rules to "be consistent" with the majority of other states in connection with trade names.
That reconsideration led to Wednesday's amendment, which explicitly allows trade names.
Texas lawyers are divided about the use of trade names, Kinard said, although he said "most people at least realize it can't be stopped." A number of lawyers on either side of the issue submitted written comments to the CDRR.
Houston trial lawyer Steve Waldman of Sandoval & Waldman expressed his support for trade names in a comment he submitted March 5. He wrote that the extensive use of domain names and inroads into the Texas legal market by national and international law firms has "reformatted" the practice of law.
"We can operate on the same principles as banks and other financial institutions. There is nothing misleading about a trade name per se. And a law firm name that incorporates the names of lawyers from others states or countries is a trade name," Waldman wrote.
But Houston lawyer Michael Sanders, of Sanders LLP, expressed strong concern in a written comment March 2, arguing that the use of trade names "cheapens the profession" and is misleading.
"We do not need the people choosing lawyers based upon who came up with the best trade name," Sanders wrote.
|Read More
Do Trade Names 'Cheapen' the Profession? Texas Lawyers to Debate Rule Change
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Salaries for Marketing, Business Development Professionals in Texas, Nationally Are Growing Salaries for Marketing, Business Development Professionals in Texas, Nationally Are Growing](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/e9/d1/5475c5d04b958ecba6be6ce0837c/earning-money-767x633-2.jpg)
Salaries for Marketing, Business Development Professionals in Texas, Nationally Are Growing
4 minute read![Pulling the Ripcord? High-Earning Partners and Early Retirement Pulling the Ripcord? High-Earning Partners and Early Retirement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/44/26/7e0c27c84752aebbea049da29841/businesswoman-exiting-door-767x633-1.jpg)
![As Global Law Firm Mergers Keep Coming, Will There Ever Be a New Swiss Verein? As Global Law Firm Mergers Keep Coming, Will There Ever Be a New Swiss Verein?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/66/cb/882f9b83414fa614090f4d62d18b/mergers-and-aquisitions-02-767x633.jpg)
As Global Law Firm Mergers Keep Coming, Will There Ever Be a New Swiss Verein?
![Fresh Off Expansion in New York, Honolulu, Dallas-founded Thompson Coe Plans Denver Launch Fresh Off Expansion in New York, Honolulu, Dallas-founded Thompson Coe Plans Denver Launch](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/57/bb/2b101ac9452e984f34ba803c211f/thompson-coe-sign-2-767x633.jpg)
Fresh Off Expansion in New York, Honolulu, Dallas-founded Thompson Coe Plans Denver Launch
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Global Lawyer: Big Law Walks a Tightrope But Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
- 2US Judge Dismisses Securities Litigation Against Insurance Underwriter
- 3Keller Postman and Jenner & Block Accuse Each Other of Unethical Actions in Tubi Settlement
- 4Lateral Attorney Transitions Under the Ethics Rules
- 5Newsom Appoints 11 Superior Court Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250