Will Texas Courts Be Ready for the Influx of Debt-Collection Lawsuits on the Horizon? Here's a Look at the Numbers
Debt case numbers more than doubled from 1.7 million in 1993 to 4 million in 2013, according to a research report by The Pew Charitable Trusts. The COVID-19 economic disruptions may fuel further growth in the case category.
May 07, 2020 at 02:58 PM
4 minute read
The COVID-19 pandemic's drastic impact on the economy could accelerate the number of debt collection lawsuits, a case category that's already seen growth this decade, according to a new report.
Debt cases have skyrocketed by 88% in Texas district and county courts in the past five years, but the Lone Star State is just one example of a trend playing out nationwide.
Debt case numbers more than doubled from 1.7 million in 1993, which amounted to 12% of all civil cases that year, to 4 million in 2013, which was 24% of all civil litigation that year, according to a research report by The Pew Charitable Trusts. The rising case numbers and lopsided odds have prompted recommendations for reform in the report.
"As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to shutter businesses and disrupt the national economy, the number of debt collection lawsuits may continue to grow," said a statement by Erika Rickard, director of the civil legal system modernization project at Pew. "This coming wave presents a critical opportunity for court leaders and other policymakers to take action to ensure that all parties in state civil courts have the chance to be heard and receive a ruling based on the facts."
The Pew report examined court data on debt lawsuits in 12 states and determined that debt cases were the most common type of civil lawsuit in Texas, Virginia, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, according to a news release.
The debtors who are facing the increasing numbers of lawsuits often go it alone in court—less than 10% hire attorneys—or they never even answer the lawsuit, then get slapped with default judgments.
|'More than doubled'
The study was hampered by the fact that the majority of states do not have great data on their civil legal systems. For example, 38 states didn't have information on debt claims in their courts. Pew found that Texas is the only state reporting details on all types of cases, and case outcomes, in all its courts.
"In Texas, the only state for which comprehensive statewide data are available, debt claims more than doubled from 2014 to 2018, accounting for 30% of the state's civil caseload by the end of that five-year period," according to the report.
|
Read more: Civil Litigation Is Up in DFW Region, With Some Practices Booming More Than Others
The rise was even greater when looking only at Texas justice courts that handle small claims. They saw a 140% increase in debt cases from 2014 to 2018, the report said.
Having clear data has allowed Texas to see the rise of debt cases in the state, said a statement by Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht.
"The shifting landscape of cases resolved in civil courts requires us to look closely at the way we handle these cases," said Hecht, who also serves as president of the Conference of Chief Justices.
|What to do?
The Pew report included some recommendations for states to improve how their courts handle debt cases.
- First, the report said that courts should better track the numbers of debt cases.
- States need to review their policies and court rules to determine how they can make sure that both creditors and debtors get to present a case effectively.
- Courts can also get better if they use modern techniques to get information on procedures to all parties. For examples, using online processes is more accessible to people who do not have attorneys, said the report.
Read the report:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250