In a famous 1975 lecture before the Collège de France, the philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault proposed that the plague of the mid-1300s inspired two contradictory responses: one “literary” in which “law is forgotten,” one “political” in which the power of the state “is exercised to the full.” I want to set aside for today the anarchic response to pandemics and draw our attention to the political response, which to intellectual historian Martin Wagner “imagines the measures taken against the spreading of the disease as a complete imposition of political power over the population and, concretely, over the individuals into which this population can be divided.”

We’ll consider Foucault’s concern in greater detail, but at the outset it’s important to note that his bifurcated perspective does not exhaust the whole of law’s relationship to pandemics. Nonetheless, it’s a solid stepping-off point.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]