Texas Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Over Worker's COVID-19 Death Could Point to Trend in Litigation
"They are taking care of us, and we need to take care of them," said plaintiffs co-counsel Quentin Brogdon. "When we don't take care of them, there needs to be consequences, and that's what this lawsuit is about."
May 14, 2020 at 03:22 PM
3 minute read
In what might be a first for Texas, the family of a health care worker who died from COVID-19 has sued his employer for not providing personal protective equipment to prevent his infection.
Maurice Dotson, who died April 17, worked for 25 years as a certified nurse aide at the West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Austin. His mother, Florence Dodson, has sued his employer, Regency IHS of West Oaks, alleging the company "put profits over the safety of its patients and staff."
The company didn't provide masks and other protective gear, which exposed patients and staff to infection, said the petition in Dodson v. Regency IHS of West Oaks, filed Wednesday in Travis County District Court.
"As far as I know, it is the first lawsuit related to a health care worker dying from COVID-19 in Texas," said Quentin Brogdon, partner in Crain Brogdon Rogers in Dallas, who is co-counsel for the plaintiff.
But it won't be the last.
Plaintiffs attorneys across the country are gearing up to sue over injuries and deaths from COVID-19 exposure. They've already targeted cruise ships, a meat-processing plant and elderly care facilities, law.com reported this month.
|
Read more: God's Waiting Room: Litigating Nursing Home Cases in the Age of COVID-19
Dodson, who is suing for herself and for her son's estate, alleged that in late March the Texas Health and Human Services Department inspected West Oaks and cited the company for personal protective equipment violations.
The defendant did not recognize the likelihood that the virus would hit West Oaks and didn't appreciate the danger of COVID-19, the suit said. The company didn't develop and implement policies and procedures about how to respond to the coronavirus infections there, did not train staff about preventing and containing the virus, failed to train nurse aides about using personal protective equipment, and failed to provide that equipment to them, among other things, according to the petition.
The harm to Maurice Dodson was foreseeable, the plaintiff alleged. The company failed to protect him, said the lawsuit.
The plaintiff is suing for negligence and seeks more than $1 million in survival damages for the mother, wrongful death damages for the son and exemplary damages.
"Regency was consciously aware of an extreme degree of risk to its patient and healthcare workers such as Maurice Dotson and those similarly situated, but it nevertheless proceeded in failing to act to protect them in complete disregard for the rights, safety and welfare of Mr. Dotson and those similarly situated," the petition said.
Brooke Ladner, senior vice president at Regency Integrated Health Services in Victoria, didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
"Nurses and nursing assistants like Maurice shouldn't have to fight their employers for PPE at any time, but definitely in a pandemic," said plaintiffs co-counsel Kathleen Kearney. "They shouldn't have to sacrifice their lives for us."
Brogdon added, "They are taking care of us, and we need to take care of them. When we don't take care of them, there needs to be consequences, and that's what this lawsuit is about."
|
Read the petition:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham & Watkins Successfully Defend Patents at the ITC for Cosmetic Devices
3 minute readHouston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
4 minute readAttorney General Seeks Permanent Injunction Against Abortion-Related Telemedicine
2 minute readBig Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250