COVID-19 Hasn't Wrecked Auto Accident Lawyers' Earnings Yet. But a Crash Is Coming
In a national survey, 58% of car wreck lawyers said their income stayed the same during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it flips on the head in terms of future income expectations. There were 71% who expected a future drop in earnings. Why?
May 26, 2020 at 08:41 AM
4 minute read
People stay at home. Highways have fewer cars. One result? Fewer auto collisions.
That means fewer lawsuits.
And less income for plaintiff lawyers who handle that litigation.
"During the shutdown, I saw images of Mopac from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. on a Friday—it was wide open," Austin solo practitioner Joe Lopez said about a busy highway in the Texas capital city. "If there's no cars on the road, then yes, the case intake will go down, and you will see a reflected downturn in revenue in six, nine or 12 months. It's still a ways out. You have not been through that cycle quite yet."
In a survey by ALM Media that examined how the coronavirus pandemic is impacting attorneys' incomes, 58% of the 45 motor vehicle attorneys who responded said their income has stayed the same during the pandemic—the largest rate of any practice area polled. These respondents came from Connecticut, Texas, Georgia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida and New York.
However, that figure flipped on its head when attorneys predicted their future income: 71% of the lawyers said they are expecting a decrease.
View the results:
Graphic: David Palmer/ALM
|
Lawsuit Pipeline
Why haven't motor vehicle injury lawyers already felt the pinch from the coronavirus?
It's because the cases that are paying out now have been in the pipeline since before the pandemic, Lopez explained.
"Those were already produced goods, if you think of it from a factory-output standpoint," he said.
But it's new cases that are taking a hit.
Clients have stopped calling these lawyers: 73% of respondents told us they're getting fewer contacts from potential clients seeking representation.
Attorneys also are seeing decreases in new case numbers. When we asked how their case volumes have already changed, 62% of the motor vehicle lawyers reported a current decreased.
Pennsylvania defense attorney Daniel E. Cummins, who represents the insured defendants in collision cases, said his insurance company clients are already cutting the number of assignments they give Cummins' firm.
Cummins said he thinks more claims are settling before they get to the litigation stage.
"Some insurance companies are reaching out to plaintiffs' attorneys to settle cases. Some plaintiffs' attorneys may need to settle cases to keep the cash flow running and keep their offices running and take care of their overhead," he said. "Also, you have plaintiffs out of work because their places of employment are shut down. They may need a quick boost to their bank account. All those factors may come together to make all the parties involved more willing to reach an amicable solution."
Another reason that plaintiffs counsel are filing fewer lawsuits now is because it's harder to get clients' medical records from health care providers that are closed down or running on skeleton crews, said Guy Choate, a partner at Webb, Stokes & Sparks in San Angelo, Texas.
The silver lining is that Choate said he does not view the future as bleak. People will start having car collisions again, and there will be work for lawyers.
The survey showed that motor vehicle lawyers do expect clients to pick up the phones again—somewhat. Even though 60% still expected fewer calls, there were 18% of the 45 attorneys who thought they'd get more client calls in the future.
"Obviously, nothing like this has happened in any of our lifetimes. But if the experience shows us anything, it's that we will prevail and come back," said Choate. "It's the nature of the contingent fee practice: You have good years and bad years. We've been here a long time, and a 30% or 50% drop is really something we would rather not have, but we will survive."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250