Conference Center Courtrooms? Harris County Judges Searching for Space for Socially Distanced Voir Dire
Harris County judges are searching for a conference center for in-person voir dire. The courts in Houston, preparing for a June 1 reopening, are also installing sneeze guards and sanitation stations, and rearranging furniture 6 feet apart.
May 28, 2020 at 02:41 PM
5 minute read
The space that Harris County uses for jury assemblies can only hold 60 people, when taking social distancing into account. But the courts need to call 230 or more people per jury pool.
The discrepancy has pushed Harris County judges to tour the NRG Center, a conference center that is part of a complex of buildings surrounding the Houston Texans' football stadium, said 152nd District Judge Robert Schaffer, who is Harris County's local administrative judge. Another option is the George R. Brown Convention Center, he said.
"To call juries, we need a much larger place to call them to," Schaffer said. "Options are limited: It's got to be a big, open space. If you are going to call 200 people in, you've got to have a really big space if you are going to put them 6 feet apart."
Time is limited to find a spot and ink a deal, he added. There are five grand juries expiring in July, and the county will need to conduct voir dire to replace them during the first week of July. To have the lead time to summon those prospective grand jurors to jury duty, the notices need to go out three or four weeks early, Schaffer said.
There's no telling how long the county will have to do jury selections in a conference center, but Schaffer guessed it could last until a COVID-19 vaccine or effective treatment comes out. The judges are thinking about using the conference center space to call the jury pool, divide them into jury panels and allow lawyers in cases to select their jurors. But the actual jury trial would still happen at the courthouse.
"It makes more sense to do the voir dire there the same day and get that done, and then send them home and tell them to come back to the 174th District Court in the criminal courthouse—or whatever other court it is that selected the jury," he said.
As the courts continue searching for a conference center, they're also getting ready to reopen June 1 for in-person proceedings. Harris County has submitted its operation plan to the Texas Office of Court Administration, explaining how it plans to keep people safe from infection. The city of Houston also submitted a COVID-19 operating plan for its municipal courts.
|Read more: Things Will Change When Texas Courthouses Reopen: Judiciary Lays Road Map for After June 1
Judges and court staff will keep working from home when they can, and remote proceedings will still be commonplace.
"The county is investigating the ability to have computers or tablets at local libraries or JP courts to increase remote access for the litigants and the public," according to the plan.
The judges and staff, and everyone who comes into the courthouse, will have to answer questions about symptoms and have a temperature check. Face coverings will be required at all times in the courthouse. Courts can turn away people who refuse to wear masks. People should bring their own, but if they don't, the county will provide a disposable face mask as long as supplies are available.
|Read more: Texas Judges Are Searching for Protective Gear Before Reopening Courthouses
Sneeze guards have already gone up in some criminal district courts, and the county will be installing them in other courts.
"The county will strive to provide sneeze guards for the clerks, court reporters, court staff and witnesses. The county will also strive to provide each court with face coverings and gloves," noted the operations plan.
Among other things, the plan describes extensive new cleaning procedures, the special protections for people in the high-risk groups for COVID-19, notes that elevator use will be restricted and talks about rearranging furniture in courtrooms to be 6 feet apart.
Court schedules are going to change, according to the plan. Judges will review their dockets to see if they can handle cases by submission or remotely, and which ones really need an in-person hearing. Courts will stagger their schedules to reduce the flow of people coming to the courthouse.
"Each court will strive to reduce its number of in-person hearings and will strive to schedule in-person hearings in such a way as to maintain proper social distancing within the courtroom itself," the plan noted.
Harris County operations plan:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 2Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
- 3Datasite's Ethics and Compliance Team Drives Transformation
- 4$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 5OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250