Stir-Craziness During the Pandemic
We're all going a little stir-crazy during this pandemic, but sometimes it seems that someone has turned the occasional oddness of the legal system…
June 01, 2020 at 12:04 PM
5 minute read
John G. Browning, a Partner at Spencer Fane LLP.
We're all going a little stir-crazy during this pandemic, but sometimes it seems that someone has turned the occasional oddness of the legal system up to 11. Recently, we had the U.S. Supreme Court making history with its first telephonic oral arguments, and all anyone can talk about is "the flush heard 'round the world." In the midst of oral arguments during Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, and just as attorney Roman Martinez was arguing that the right to robocall is protected by the First Amendment, the distinctive sound of someone flushing a toilet projected across the court's live audio. Was the culprit a tech-challenged justice who forgot to mute? We may never know, but the incident certainly gave new meaning to live streaming or "doo" process.
And speaking of toilet humor, a recent cease-and-desist letter provided a master class in the art of giving one's adversary crap. Attorney Kevin Christopher took exception to the company Poo-Pourri denigrating his poop spray-manufacturing client, Turdcules at a tradeshow. In a very entertaining cease-and-desist letter that covered everything from Poo-Pourri's insinuations about the toxicity of Turdcules' product to its attacking of Turdcules' bearded mascot, "The Craptain," Christopher made fun of the rival company's attempt to portray itself as "classy." Chiding his counterpart at Poo-Pourri that it was hard to regard a company that sought trademark rights to terms like "brown load" and "yule logs" as classy, Christopher reminded him to "just remember at the end of the day both companies sell poop spray, not diamonds." Whoever prevails in this dispute will certainly be flush with success, if not smelling like a rose.
Some might say this pandemic has left some of those in the legal profession with too much time on their hands, and that's definitely true of some law professors. University of Iowa law professor Gregory Shill came up with the "Yada Yada Law School," a free online 10-week lecture series through the prism of the beloved TV show "Seinfeld." The Zoom school isn't about nothing, but instead has volunteer professors from schools like Stanford teaching about contracts, constitutional law, criminal procedure, and other subjects using clips from "Seinfeld" to illustrate key concepts. Shill had no problem attracting professors with a fondness for Jerry, George, Kramer and Elaine, for the series that starts June 3; he's filled such "positions" as the "Newman U.S.P.S. Professor of Law," the "Jackie Chiles Chair in Constitutional Criminal Procedure," and the "Art Vandelay Dean and Kenny Rogers Roasters Foundation Chair in Business Law." As Shill says, "The idea is to provide some entertainment during quarantine while offering some educational value." I can't argue with that, Professor Shill; we're all just "Puddy" in your hands. I bet students will get an education that's real and spectacular.
Some people's humor during quarantine might seem creepy to others. For example, when Virginia three-star restaurant The Inn at Little Washington reopened May 15, it had a unique way of coping with state mandates about limited capacity and social distancing. Instead of letting half the restaurant sit vacant, Chef Patrick O'Connell filled half of his dining room with life-size mannequins dressed in 1940s-ish garb. Servers were even instructed to pour them wine and ask them about their evening. And if that's not odd enough for you, Florida attorney Daniel Uhlfelder has been roaming beaches in his state dressed like the Grim Reaper. Intending to draw attention to the dangers of returning to public beaches while the coronavirus death toll continues to climb, the litigator/harvester of souls dons a hooded black robe and wields a plastic scythe as he wanders the sands. Whether you label it a public stunt or a public health warning, Uhlfelder's unusual protest has gained national coverage from outlets like CNN and Saturday Night Live.
And finally, there are good ways to respond to a bar disciplinary complaint, and there are bad ways to do so. Thanks to a May 12 ruling from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, we now know that "Boom Shakalaka" is not an acceptable response to such a complaint. Apparently Lowell, Massachusetts, lawyer Ilya Liviz was administratively suspended for practicing in April 2019, but he continued to render legal services—a finding that led a trial judge to find him in contempt for not complying with the suspension order. Liviz's response to the bar counsel's investigation consisted of the words "SILENCE. (BOOM SHAKALAKA)." Massachusetts's highest court affirmed the contempt finding, holding that Liviz made "no meaningful attempt to challenge" it on appeal.
And there you have it—Boom Shakalaka!
John G. Browning is a Dallas-based attorney who handles a wide variety of civil litigation in state and federal courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21 5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/05/AdobeStock_329141900-767x633.jpg)
5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read![Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: New Laterals, Expanding Teams
- 2Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 3AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 4One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 5Making the Case for Workflow Automation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250