DLA Piper Team Withdraws in Texas Recruiter's Contentious Trade Secrets Suit
The trial team from DLA Piper's Dallas office asked to withdraw a month after a Texas magistrate judge took them to task over their handling of a discovery document.
June 05, 2020 at 06:18 PM
3 minute read
Three DLA Piper litigators in Dallas have withdrawn from defending recruiter Evan Jowers in a trade secrets suit filed by Austin's MWK Recruiting. Last month, a magistrate judge in Austin had criticized the DLA Piper team for how it handled a discovery dispute.
At that hearing on May 1, a DLA Piper lawyer told U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin that miscommunication led to the firm improperly identifying a court filing as "certified"—signaling it had conferred with MWK's lawyers in good faith before submitting the motion—when that was not true.
Austin aired his frustration at that hearing with the lawyers involved in the litigation, asking them to quit the "game playing" and instead focus on the facts of the dispute.
Whether that upbraiding prompted the DLA Piper litigators from Dallas to formally withdraw from the trial court litigation is unclear, even as the case heads toward a trial next February. Jowers said Friday that DLA Piper is still involved on his behalf.
In a motion filed on Wednesday, the DLA Piper lawyers asked to withdraw "because DLA Piper and Mr. Jowers are unable to reach agreement with respect to the continued development of this matter." U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman of the Western District of Texas granted the motion on Thursday.
The DLA Piper team includes Marc Katz, managing partner of the firm's office in Dallas, and associates James Bookhout and Marina Stefanova. Katz did not immediately return a telephone message, and Bookhout, who had apologized to Austin about how the certification was handled, said he could not comment.
MWK Recruiting, the parent of Kinney Recruiting and related entities, alleged in the complaint that Jowers used proprietary information and trade secrets to directly compete with MWK Recruiting companies, breaching a noncompete agreement. In an answer, Jowers alleged he was coerced into signing the noncompete, and alleged that he did not take trade secrets or confidential information because it was available elsewhere.
Jowers' new attorney, Robert Tauler of Tauler Smith in Los Angeles, who entered the case on May 8, declined to comment on why his former co-counsel withdrew. And Robert Kinney, owner of Kinney Recruiting, who is on the legal team representing MWK Recruiting in the suit against Jowers, declined to speculate.
But Jowers, now at recruiting firm Jowers Vargas, said on Friday that he asked Tauler to take the lead in the litigation, but the DLA Piper team will continue to work on appeals in the litigation.
The litigation has been contentious in several ways, with Kirkland & Ellis being chastised by Austin, who said the firm "should be embarrassed" after it fought a subpoena filed by Kinney seeking placement information. The firm ultimately complied.
Read More:
Exasperated Texas Judge Warns Lawyers in Recruiter Case Against 'Game Playing'
Rebuke of Kirkland in Recruiter's Federal Suit Raises Questions About Placement Secrecy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 27
- 2Cornell Claims AT&T, Verizon Violated the University's Wi-Fi Patents
- 3OCR Issues 'Dear Colleagues' Letter Regarding AI in Medicine
- 4Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 5E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250