DLA Piper Team Withdraws in Texas Recruiter's Contentious Trade Secrets Suit
The trial team from DLA Piper's Dallas office asked to withdraw a month after a Texas magistrate judge took them to task over their handling of a discovery document.
June 05, 2020 at 06:18 PM
3 minute read
Three DLA Piper litigators in Dallas have withdrawn from defending recruiter Evan Jowers in a trade secrets suit filed by Austin's MWK Recruiting. Last month, a magistrate judge in Austin had criticized the DLA Piper team for how it handled a discovery dispute.
At that hearing on May 1, a DLA Piper lawyer told U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin that miscommunication led to the firm improperly identifying a court filing as "certified"—signaling it had conferred with MWK's lawyers in good faith before submitting the motion—when that was not true.
Austin aired his frustration at that hearing with the lawyers involved in the litigation, asking them to quit the "game playing" and instead focus on the facts of the dispute.
Whether that upbraiding prompted the DLA Piper litigators from Dallas to formally withdraw from the trial court litigation is unclear, even as the case heads toward a trial next February. Jowers said Friday that DLA Piper is still involved on his behalf.
In a motion filed on Wednesday, the DLA Piper lawyers asked to withdraw "because DLA Piper and Mr. Jowers are unable to reach agreement with respect to the continued development of this matter." U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman of the Western District of Texas granted the motion on Thursday.
The DLA Piper team includes Marc Katz, managing partner of the firm's office in Dallas, and associates James Bookhout and Marina Stefanova. Katz did not immediately return a telephone message, and Bookhout, who had apologized to Austin about how the certification was handled, said he could not comment.
MWK Recruiting, the parent of Kinney Recruiting and related entities, alleged in the complaint that Jowers used proprietary information and trade secrets to directly compete with MWK Recruiting companies, breaching a noncompete agreement. In an answer, Jowers alleged he was coerced into signing the noncompete, and alleged that he did not take trade secrets or confidential information because it was available elsewhere.
Jowers' new attorney, Robert Tauler of Tauler Smith in Los Angeles, who entered the case on May 8, declined to comment on why his former co-counsel withdrew. And Robert Kinney, owner of Kinney Recruiting, who is on the legal team representing MWK Recruiting in the suit against Jowers, declined to speculate.
But Jowers, now at recruiting firm Jowers Vargas, said on Friday that he asked Tauler to take the lead in the litigation, but the DLA Piper team will continue to work on appeals in the litigation.
The litigation has been contentious in several ways, with Kirkland & Ellis being chastised by Austin, who said the firm "should be embarrassed" after it fought a subpoena filed by Kinney seeking placement information. The firm ultimately complied.
|Read More:
Exasperated Texas Judge Warns Lawyers in Recruiter Case Against 'Game Playing'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250