Ex-Beck Redden Lawyer's Estate Demands Share of $2.9M Contingency Fee
Beck Redden called the lawsuit "unfounded in every way."
June 10, 2020 at 08:48 AM
3 minute read
The estate of a former Beck Redden lawyer has filed a breach of employment suit against the Houston trial firm, alleging it has failed to pay the lawyer's share of a $2.9 million contingency fee on a suit he brought to the firm.
The estate of Neil O'Kane Bowman, who died last summer, alleged in a petition filed on Friday in state district court in Harris County that the trial lawyer was "directly responsible" for a $10 million settlement in the underlying suit.
"Rather than fulfilling its agreement to pay a 15% bonus on the [suit] (totaling approximately $435,000) or compensating Bowman for his diligent work at Beck Redden LLP, defendant instead unexpectedly terminated Bowman's employment and refused to fairly compensate him in accordance with its written and oral agreements," the estate alleged in the petition.
Beck Redden said in a statement that the suit is "unfounded in every way."
The allegations in the suit focus on the terms of the employment agreement Bowman signed with Beck Redden when he joined the firm in 2016.
The petition says Bowman signed an employment agreement with Beck Redden that was effective on Sept. 26, 2016. The estate alleged the firm orally represented to Bowman that he would receive a 15% bonus of the contingency fee if a lawsuit against Marathon Oil EF that Bowman would bring to the firm was successfully resolved.
"This bonus was defendant's standard policy and was directly represented to Bowman as a term of his employment," the petition alleged.
The estate alleged that representation was false, because the firm terminated his employment on Nov. 6, 2017, effective at the end of 2017, and subsequently refused to pay the bonus for his work on the suit, despite the firm receiving more than $2.9 million in fees.
Bowman devoted about 2,500 hours to the suit, the petition alleged, and he "personally convinced" his clients to stay with Beck Redden, even after they expressed dissatisfaction with the firm.
The estate alleged Bowman and Beck Redden entered into a settlement agreement on July 3, 2019, but the firm has since then failed to pay up.
But in the statement, Beck Redden wrote that the allegation that the firm made an oral promise to Bowman is contradicted by his written employment agreement, which spelled out his salary and "did not give him a percentage interest in any case or fee."
The firm alleged it paid Bowman "every penny of the salary he agreed to in writing," and it offered him severance on his departure. The firm did not make an oral side deal, the firm wrote in the statement.
The firm also disputed Bowman's claim that he had settled his fee claim with the firm in July 2019, because he passed away before the alleged agreement was reached.
Dale Jefferson, a partner in Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom in Houston who represents Beck Redden, said Bowman died at least two days before the "so-called acceptance of the offer."
Bowman's estate brings breach of employment contract, fraudulent inducement, quantum meruit, promissory estoppel and breach of settlement agreement causes of action against the firm, and seeks between $200,000 and $1 million in damages.
Plaintiff's attorney, Kimberley Spurlock of Spurlock & Associates in Humbie, did not immediately return a telephone message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVinson & Elkins Expands Environmental Team with Chair of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
4 minute readNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readHouston Trial Lawyer Mary-Olga Lovett Leaves King & Spalding to Open Boutique
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250