'It's a Matter of Privilege': Dallas Law School Revokes Incoming Student's Admission Over Allegedly Racist Posts
Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law announced on Twitter that it revoked the admission of an incoming law student because of allegedly racially offensive social media content.
June 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
An incoming law student's admission to Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law in Dallas was revoked Wednesday because of alleged racially offensive social media content.
"SMU has revoked its offer of admission to an incoming Dedman School of Law student, based on the student's racially offensive behavior recorded on social media that contradicts the university's core values—specifically, its commitment to diversity and inclusion," said a law school statement on Twitter. "Racism has no place on a campus that embraces respect for all SMU students, faculty and staff and equips its students to make a difference in the world."
The law school did not release the student's name or any details on the allegedly racist social media posts. When asked for details, school spokeswoman Lynn Dempsey wrote in an email that the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act restricts what the law school can say about law students.
Dean Jennifer Collins declined to comment.
But Collins wrote in a June 2 statement to the law school community that the law school shared the national grief and outrage over the killings of George Floyd in Minneapolis and other black men and women.
"As lawyers, we have a special obligation to demand that we do better and actively work together toward a more just and compassionate nation free of the discrimination and hatred that continues to plague this country," Collins wrote in the statement. "We cannot allow the fact we are not physically together at the moment to keep us from the critical work we must do to address injustice and protect marginalized communities, not only from acts of violence, but also from the inequities laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic and its disparate impact on people of color."
In response to the law school's Twitter announcement about revoking the student's admission, one woman tweeted back that this was a reason she chose the law school.
This is one of the reasons I chose @SMULawSchool. When I met with admissions and the Dean they made sure to make me know I was welcome. Yes there are issues, but I truly appreciate that we are moving forward. I am proud to #PonyUp & #PonyUpDallas
— [email protected] (@SelfeSTEAMgirl) June 11, 2020
In recent weeks, black students at Southern Methodist University have been recounting racism they experienced on campus through Twitter posts with the hashtag "#BlackAtSMU." University President R. Gerald Turner responded with a statement.
"It grieves me to read them because this is not what we envision for SMU," Turner wrote. "The negative experiences shared through #BlackAtSMU are a stark reminder that we still have a lot of work to do."
Adjunct SMU law professor John Browning, who speaks and writes about use of social media by law students, lawyers and judges, said that he hasn't seen the posts and didn't know if they were public or private.
"Evidently, someone was familiar with it and familiar with the student, and shared it with people in the law school community," said Browning, partner in Spencer Fane in Dallas.
He said that he's never known of an SMU law student who was dismissed for offensive social media post. But it's an growing issue around the nation.
"Online misbehavior by law students is certainly not a rare phenomenon, and it's one law students don't realize can pose a real career problem for them," Browning said. "I don't know the details. I don't want to personally pass judgment. But if they were troubling enough for the school to consider it contrary to the core values, I think it's the school's right to do that. Being admitted to a professional or graduate program is not a matter of right. It's a matter of privilege. It can be rescinded for any number of reasons."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCase With 'Serious Consequences for Corporate Law' Heads to Texas Supreme Court
5 minute readHow Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250