Self-Driving Cars and the Future of Personal Injury Law
Self-driving cars are under high scrutiny, but we shouldn't ignore the impact they will have on the world once the world accepts their innovative technology.
June 11, 2020 at 08:03 PM
5 minute read
Self-driving cars may be the future thanks to the innovative Tesla, Uber and Volvo, but are they the future for personal injury law?
This is the question that drives the thinking in regard to personal injury. Self-driving cars are safer. They have quick-time reactions due to their high-level technology. They aren't distracted like drivers, and they can't become intoxicated. With self-driving cars, accidents may be a thing of the past. While there have been two reported accidents from self-driving cars in March 2018, it doesn't compare to the hundreds upon thousands upon hundred thousands of deaths that occur from human drivers.
Self-driving cars are under high scrutiny, but we shouldn't ignore the impact they will have on the world once the world accepts their innovative technology. With that being said, how will personal injury law firms adjust?
How Could It Be Dangerous
The first question we should be asking is how safe self-driving cars are?
In a nutshell, we already have self-driving functions. There is cruise control in vehicles and even airplanes have auto-pilot. These are designed to be safe already. But permanent self-automated functions could potentially be dangerous. With airplanes, they fly mostly on auto-pilot and they have technology to see if they are about to run into any other airplanes. With cars, we rely on our eyesight and rearview mirrors rather than our technology. We have more liabilities on the road when it comes to vehicles. This alone is why self-driving vehicles can be so dangerous. Without eyesight, how can cars know not to cause an accident? If reliant on technology and that technology fails us, where do we go next? We are on the brink of a technological revolution, so it's best we stay vigilant in terms of safety and security.
Thankfully all these are simply fears rather than facts. Who knows if any of the above will happen?
Legally Speaking
Potential dangers aside, where does this stand in the legal field?
With self-driving cars, it seems as if negligence will shift from the driver to the vehicle. But this shift muddles the field of filing claims and determining who is at-fault. Will the claim be against the technology or the car company? Or a third party who installed the parts? Once self-driving cars dominate the roads, it'll be more difficult to identify a claim or who is at-fault, and then it'll be difficult to be compensated. Products liability cases take years to litigate, and if people get involved in an accident with a self-driving vehicle, it's more than likely it'll end up as a product liability case. Whatever the case, with a driver out of the picture, it will be harder for damages to be compensated since car companies and manufacturers have highly-skilled lawyers backing them up, not to mention their deep pockets. These are one of the realities we will have to face when accepting self-driving cars.
In addition, the state of personal insurance can change. Insurance adjusters rely on human error to exploit victims, so with human error out of the picture, what will they use now? Self-driving cars will no doubt alter the state of the insurance company industry, impacting them worse than personal injury firms. With the losses they're about to receive from the total emergence of self-driving cars, could this be the end of personal insurance?
The emergence of self-driving cars brings forth the most important question for personal injury lawyers: is this the end of our normal process of personal injury law? There have been fewer accidents on the road. With fewer wrecks, there will be fewer cases. Fewer cases can mean the downfall of the business. And eventually the industry.
But will it fall or will we adapt?
The transition can lead to new approaches to cases, as described above, as well as approaches to serving justice. Only time will tell, but it's safe to say fellow personal injury lawyers better prepare for this impending future rather than focusing on the now.
Hank Stout co-founded Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm to protect and pursue the rights of people who were harmed by the carelessness of others. He is Board-Certified in personal injury trial law and has been actively trying cases for over 15 years. In recognition of his accomplishments and results, he has been selected by Thompson Reuters as a Super Lawyer since 2014 (a distinction given to less than 1% of the lawyers in the state of Texas) and has been selected as Lead Counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250