Texas Immigration Firm Sues Former Lawyer, Alleges 'Deceitful and Dishonest Behavior'
The Dallas and Houston-based firm claims its former attorney tried to steal clients when he left in the spring.
June 11, 2020 at 06:39 PM
3 minute read
A Texas immigration firm owned by lawyers Andrew Thomas and Eric Price is demanding more than $1 million in damages from former lawyer Aaron Christensen, alleging he resigned on April 27 without notice or explanation and solicited the firm's clients for his own competing firm.
Related firms Thomas Price PLLC and Andrew T. Thomas PLLC allege in a petition filed on Tuesday in state district court in Houston that Christensen took client information with him when he left the firm and used it for his personal gain.
The firm is known as Thomas Price PLLC in Dallas and Andrew T. Thomas PLLC in Houston.
Judge Kristen Hawkins of the 11th District in Harris County signed a temporary restraining order on Tuesday to prevent Christensen or his new firm from using client information taken from his old firm, interfering with client contracts, destroying any client information related to any client solicitation, or using any trade secrets from his former firm.
Christensen broadly denied the allegations in an answer filed on Tuesday, and he filed a defamation counterclaim seeking $500,000 for a posting about him on his former firm's Facebook account, which alleged he had acted in a dishonest and malicious way.
In an interview on Thursday, Christensen said his only communication with clients from his former firm was to notify them that he had opened his own firm on May 4. To date, he said, he has not signed up any clients from his former firm, nor accepted payment from any of them.
But Dale Jefferson, who represents the plaintiffs, said in an interview on Thursday that the suit isn't an effort to stop Christensen from forming his own firm, but a response to him seeking to "shortcut" the work of building a client base.
"At a time where people are in perhaps the most critical crossroads of their life, trying to garner American citizenship, lawyers are supposed to be there to help them, not to figure out a way to exploit an employment arrangement for their own financial gain," said Jefferson, a partner at Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom in Houston.
The petition alleges that after Christensen resigned he left behind a business plan, which, the plaintiffs assert, demonstrates that he had been planning his competing firm while on the job. It also alleges he downloaded information from the firm's client database, including phone numbers, email information and "likely" their home addresses, and that he had access to clients' immigration status and credit card data.
"Unfortunately, Christensen used the wrongfully misappropriated data to contact the firm's clients in an effort to get them to breach their ongoing business relationship and payment plans with the firm and instead wrongfully divert that business for his personal financial gain," the petition alleges.
Due to Christensen's "deceitful and dishonest behavior," the firm has fielded calls from clients asking why Christensen instructed them to not make payments to the firm because he is their attorney, according to the petition.
The immigration firm brings tortious interference with contract and business relations and breach of fiduciary duty causes of action against Christensen, who started work at the firm in 2016, and alleges he violated the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-87
- 2The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 3Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 4Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 5Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250