This Texan Running for Judge Egged a County Official's SUV. Now Lawyers Want Him Out of the Race
Eric Yollick, a Republican candidate in a runoff for Montgomery County's 457th District Court, was charged with misdemeanor criminal mischief for egging a Montgomery County official's vehicle, to protest a COVID-19 stay-home order.
June 12, 2020 at 01:41 PM
5 minute read
Attorneys in Montgomery County are denouncing district judge candidate Eric Yollick, who was charged with criminal mischief for allegedly egging the county judge's car in protest of a COVID-19 stay-home order.
Yollick, who is running against candidate Vince Santini for the 457th District Court, has pleaded not guilty to the Class C misdemeanor—punishable by a fine of up to $500—and has a trial set for October.
Some people in the local legal community are mounting an opposition to Yollick's campaign for the district court.
"This is the least of the things he's done bad," said local attorney John Pettit Sr. of The Pettit Law Firm in Conroe. "He will get his vote out again. The thing people opposed to him have to do is realize we've got to get our vote out, too. If our group does not get going, and get people's attention, and get the vote out, I'm very concerned he could win the primary."
Yollick declined to comment.
'kindergarten ethics'
The 457th District Court is a new bench, which meant there was no incumbent in the primary.
Five candidates ran in the Republican Primary in March. Yollick won 38% and Santini won 25%, which advanced them to a runoff in July.
Whoever wins will face Democrat Marc Meyer in the November election.
Santini said that judicial candidates need to be dignified rather than making negative headlines.
"No amount of experience matters, if you haven't learned kindergarten ethics," said Santini, senior litigation attorney in The Voss Law Firm in The Woodlands. "For example, don't take things that don't belong to you. Don't damage other people's property. Treat people the way you want to be treated—things like that. I think integrity matters. Integrity matters in a courtroom, especially nowadays, when people are hungry for justice."
The egging
Yollick referred Texas Lawyer to comments that he's made in other articles.
In an article in The Golden Hammer—Yollick founded it, but no longer works there—he admitted throwing an egg on Montgomery County Judge Mark Keough's vehicle on March 27. He said it was a "light-hearted protest" against a COVID-19 lockdown and business closure order that Keough issued that day.
"People are sick and tired of being locked down while they're going broke because the government has deprived them of their livelihoods. It's sad that Judge Keough is more focused on a minor personal issue like this one rather than focusing on reopening our economy, getting people back to work, and restoring our civil liberties," he said in the article.
He said he cleaned the egg off the vehicle with paper towels and a water bottle, and later that day, offered Keough $20 for a car wash, which he declined. He argued the egging wasn't a crime because he didn't cause pecuniary loss, or any substantial inconvenience, to Keough.
Keough didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Conroe Assistant City Attorney Mike Garner, who is the prosecutor in Yollick's criminal mischief case, declined to comment.
Opposition emerges
Pettit, the Conroe lawyer, said he strongly opposes Yollick because the attorney has allegedly written untrue, divisive and hateful things about others on The Golden Hammer site.
In the past, Pettit said, a jury found that Yollick maliciously committed fraud in a civil case and awarded punitive damages.
The fraud case, JJJJ Walker v. Yollick, involved six investors who won an $118 million verdict—which included punitive damages—against Yollick and his client, First National Bank, on claims of fraud and conversion, said a September 2014 opinion by the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston.
The plaintiffs were investors who purchased three hospitals from a hospital system in bankruptcy. They alleged the defendants, through another business entity, defrauded them of their ownership interests. The jury found Yollick 10% responsible.
Although the trial court issued a judgment notwithstanding the verdict that said no evidence supported individual liability against Yollick, the 14th Court disagreed. It reinstated the judgment against Yollick.
While campaigning for the primary, several videos from doorbell cameras showed Yollick removing and crumpling other candidates' door hangers, then placing his own campaign hanger on the doors, according to an article in The Courier of Montgomery County.
Yollick admitted removing door hangers and told the newspaper he did it because they were "tattered."
Pettit, the Conroe attorney, said, "You can't learn integrity. Eric Yollick has had 60 years to learn integrity, and he hasn't done it, and he has zero judgment."
Note: This article was updated to reflect that Eric Yollick's criminal mischief charge is a Class C misdemeanor. Texas Lawyer regrets the error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHouston Trial Lawyer Mary-Olga Lovett Leaves King & Spalding to Open Boutique
3 minute readDeal Watch: Private Equity Dealmakers Make 2025 Predictions Amid Deal Resurgence
12 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250