This Texan Running for Judge Egged a County Official's SUV. Now Lawyers Want Him Out of the Race
Eric Yollick, a Republican candidate in a runoff for Montgomery County's 457th District Court, was charged with misdemeanor criminal mischief for egging a Montgomery County official's vehicle, to protest a COVID-19 stay-home order.
June 12, 2020 at 01:41 PM
5 minute read
Attorneys in Montgomery County are denouncing district judge candidate Eric Yollick, who was charged with criminal mischief for allegedly egging the county judge's car in protest of a COVID-19 stay-home order.
Yollick, who is running against candidate Vince Santini for the 457th District Court, has pleaded not guilty to the Class C misdemeanor—punishable by a fine of up to $500—and has a trial set for October.
Some people in the local legal community are mounting an opposition to Yollick's campaign for the district court.
"This is the least of the things he's done bad," said local attorney John Pettit Sr. of The Pettit Law Firm in Conroe. "He will get his vote out again. The thing people opposed to him have to do is realize we've got to get our vote out, too. If our group does not get going, and get people's attention, and get the vote out, I'm very concerned he could win the primary."
Yollick declined to comment.
|'kindergarten ethics'
The 457th District Court is a new bench, which meant there was no incumbent in the primary.
Five candidates ran in the Republican Primary in March. Yollick won 38% and Santini won 25%, which advanced them to a runoff in July.
Whoever wins will face Democrat Marc Meyer in the November election.
Santini said that judicial candidates need to be dignified rather than making negative headlines.
"No amount of experience matters, if you haven't learned kindergarten ethics," said Santini, senior litigation attorney in The Voss Law Firm in The Woodlands. "For example, don't take things that don't belong to you. Don't damage other people's property. Treat people the way you want to be treated—things like that. I think integrity matters. Integrity matters in a courtroom, especially nowadays, when people are hungry for justice."
|The egging
Yollick referred Texas Lawyer to comments that he's made in other articles.
In an article in The Golden Hammer—Yollick founded it, but no longer works there—he admitted throwing an egg on Montgomery County Judge Mark Keough's vehicle on March 27. He said it was a "light-hearted protest" against a COVID-19 lockdown and business closure order that Keough issued that day.
"People are sick and tired of being locked down while they're going broke because the government has deprived them of their livelihoods. It's sad that Judge Keough is more focused on a minor personal issue like this one rather than focusing on reopening our economy, getting people back to work, and restoring our civil liberties," he said in the article.
He said he cleaned the egg off the vehicle with paper towels and a water bottle, and later that day, offered Keough $20 for a car wash, which he declined. He argued the egging wasn't a crime because he didn't cause pecuniary loss, or any substantial inconvenience, to Keough.
Keough didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Conroe Assistant City Attorney Mike Garner, who is the prosecutor in Yollick's criminal mischief case, declined to comment.
|Opposition emerges
Pettit, the Conroe lawyer, said he strongly opposes Yollick because the attorney has allegedly written untrue, divisive and hateful things about others on The Golden Hammer site.
In the past, Pettit said, a jury found that Yollick maliciously committed fraud in a civil case and awarded punitive damages.
The fraud case, JJJJ Walker v. Yollick, involved six investors who won an $118 million verdict—which included punitive damages—against Yollick and his client, First National Bank, on claims of fraud and conversion, said a September 2014 opinion by the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston.
The plaintiffs were investors who purchased three hospitals from a hospital system in bankruptcy. They alleged the defendants, through another business entity, defrauded them of their ownership interests. The jury found Yollick 10% responsible.
Although the trial court issued a judgment notwithstanding the verdict that said no evidence supported individual liability against Yollick, the 14th Court disagreed. It reinstated the judgment against Yollick.
While campaigning for the primary, several videos from doorbell cameras showed Yollick removing and crumpling other candidates' door hangers, then placing his own campaign hanger on the doors, according to an article in The Courier of Montgomery County.
Yollick admitted removing door hangers and told the newspaper he did it because they were "tattered."
Pettit, the Conroe attorney, said, "You can't learn integrity. Eric Yollick has had 60 years to learn integrity, and he hasn't done it, and he has zero judgment."
Note: This article was updated to reflect that Eric Yollick's criminal mischief charge is a Class C misdemeanor. Texas Lawyer regrets the error.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250