Meet the Candidates for Judge of Brownsville's 138th District Court: Helen Delgadillo and Gabriel Gabby Garcia
Helen Delgadillo and Gabriel Gabby Garcia are the two Democrats competing in the primary runoff for the 138th District Court of Cameron County. There is no Republican candidate in November, which means the runoff winner will take the bench.
June 29, 2020 at 12:23 PM
6 minute read
Democratic candidate Helen Delgadillo argues she's better qualified for Cameron County's 138th District Court because she's gained the experience and honed the temperament she needs during her years as a public school teacher, lawyer and municipal court judge.
Delgadillo and Gabriel Gabby Garcia are the two Democrats competing in the primary runoff for the 138th District Court of Cameron County. There is no Republican candidate in November, which means the runoff winner will take the bench.
"Consider the path that has led me to running for the 138th District Court," Delgadillo wrote. "Each step along this path has prepared me more and more for this position. I am committed. I am experienced. I am ready."
Texas Lawyer is publishing Q&As with judicial candidates in primary election runoffs. Early voting is June 29 to July 10, and election day is July 14.
Despite multiple reminders, Garcia did not complete Texas Lawyer's questionnaire.
Here is the Q&A for Delgadillo.
Read more: Texas Voters: Meet the Candidates Running for Judge in July Primary Runoffs
|
Helen Delgadillo
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
I graduated from Texas A&M University with a bachelor of music. Thereafter, I earned a master's degree in education from Pan American University. My love for teaching and music drove my career as an educator and band director for 17 years. For 15 years, I was a band director, elementary teacher, secondary reading teacher, and elementary and secondary guidance counselor for Los Fresnos County Independent School District. For two years thereafter, I was a guidance counselor for Point Isabel ISD. After 17 years as an educator, I decided to go to law school. There were several reasons influencing my decision, but one of the main reasons was my passion for helping others.
I earned a doctor of jurisprudence from the University of Houston Law Center. I had four children to care for, and, as you can imagine, that did not leave much time outside of the classroom. My goal was to get in and get out so I could start my career as an attorney and support my children. So that is what I did. I graduated in two-and-a-half years, passed the bar exam and returned to Cameron County. I have been practicing law in Cameron County for over 22 years now. My areas of practice have ranged from civil litigation, to family law, to criminal law.
I have also served my community as a municipal judge for nearly 13 years. This is what separates me from my opponent. Being a judge is no easy task, and I know this firsthand. It takes patience, understanding, tolerance, decisiveness, and temperament. Of course, many of these qualities are innate to a certain degree, but we can always improve on anything we do. Personally, I have strengthened these qualities year after year while serving as a judge, and my goal is to keep improving as long as I am on the bench, and I believe that bench will be the 138th District Court.
I am a member of the Cameron County Bar Association and the Texas Municipal Courts Association. I am also a board member of the Laguna Madre Youth Center. I am a member and former regent for Chapter 2569 of the Catholic Daughters of the Americas, as well as a member of Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Church.
Why do you want this position?
This position combines my desire to serve my community and my resolve for justice. There is no substitute for experience and wisdom, and these two attributes are vital to the position. I believe in myself and I believe that I am the best choice for the 138th District Court.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent in the election?
I am better suited for the 138th District Court because of the path I have taken to get to this point in my life and my career.
On a professional level, I was an educator for 17 years where I developed patience and effective communication. I have been practicing law in Cameron County for over 22 years, and I have served my community as a judge for nearly 13 years where I gained firsthand knowledge of the challenges of the job.
On a personal level, I am confident in my abilities to properly administer the duties of a district court judge. I have an overwhelming urge to understand even the most nuanced details of the law, often leading to lively debates with two of my children who both practice law in Cameron County. The law is more than a job to me; it is a passion.
To the undecided voter: First, I want to thank you for exercising your right to vote because it is a right that many do not have around the world. When you vote, you share your voice and I commend you for so doing. Second, please consider the path that has led me to running for the 138th District Court. Each step along this path has prepared me more and more for this position. I am committed. I am experienced. I am ready.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
With over 22 years of practicing law, thank you for asking this question because it encompasses the respect I will give to each person and each attorney that comes before me. People simply do not have the luxury of waiting around for hours to be heard. I would schedule anticipated contested matters and time-intensive hearings later than anticipated uncontested matters. I would ensure that cases do not remain stagnant on my docket unnecessarily. I will continue to improve on my methods to ensure that I am doing the best I can to manage the docket efficiently.
Where can voters go for more information about you?
- Website: www.JudgeHelen.com
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 2Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 3Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 4Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
- 5Against the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250