Meet Vince Santini and Eric Yollick, Republicans Running for Judge of Montgomery County's 457th District Court
Vince Santini and Eric Yollick are competing for the 457th District Court of Montgomery County in the Republican Primary runoff election. Whoever wins faces Democrat Marc M. Meyer in November.
June 22, 2020 at 08:06 PM
9 minute read
In the Republican runoff for Montgomery County's 457th District Court, Vince Santini argues he's more qualified because of his hunger to serve the community, his experience handling large dockets and his better temperament than opponent Eric Yollick.
Whoever wins the Republican runoff for the newly created district court will compete against Democratic candidate Marc M. Meyer in the November election.
"Temperament is crucial because the courtroom is a place where everyone should be treated fairly and laws applied fairly. It is not a place for games, grudges, tomfoolery, nor tyrants," Santini wrote. "Most of my career has been spent in the spotlight, and I have demonstrated the level of integrity needed for this bench. On the contrary, since February 2020, my opponent has demonstrated he does not contain the requisite temperament."
Yollick has pleaded not guilty to misdemeanor Class C criminal mischief for throwing an egg at a Montgomery County official's vehicle, as a protest against a COVID-19 stay-home order. He's said he cleaned the egg immediately and it wasn't a crime because it didn't cause damage. Yollick in the past faced a civil court judgment for fraud and punitive damages.
Read more: This Texan Running for Judge Egged a County Official's SUV. Now Lawyers Want Him Out of the Race
Texas Lawyer is publishing Q&As with judicial candidates in primary runoff elections. Early voting runs from June 29 to July 10, and election day is July 14.
Despite many requests, Yollick did not complete Texas Lawyer's questionnaire.
Here is the Q&A for Santini.
Vince Santini
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
In December 2005, I earned my bachelor of science in sociology with a minor in psychology from the University of Houston, graduated summa cum laude, and was top of my class. In May 2009, I earned my doctor of jurisprudence from South Texas College of Law, where I was the number one ranked trial advocate. I earned many distinguished trial advocacy awards, including: Dean Gerald Treece's Student Advocacy Service Award and Order of the Barristers Legal Honor Society for law students who excelled as trial advocates having represented Texas in the most prestigious trial competitions around the nation, while receiving best advocate awards and trial champion. I also coached other law students on trial advocacy and the rules of evidence.
In October 2009, I was hired by the Montgomery County District Attorney's Office and immediately began trying cases. In my nine years serving Montgomery County, I participated in approximately 75 trials, including: capital murder, murder, intoxication manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, injury to a child causing death or serious bodily injury, aggravated assault and aggravated robbery. I am most proud of my days as a special victims unit prosecutor where I prosecuted sexual crimes against children under the age of 10. In 2015, I was awarded child abuse prosecutor of the year. I was published in the area of crimes against children, and was an instructor at the largest international crimes against children conference. I participated in every single aspect of trial, including arguing motions, evidentiary hearings, jury charge hearings, voir dire, witness examinations, opening and closing arguments, as well as sentencing. Brett Ligon honored me with D.A. Awards in Prosecution on eight separate occasions.
My experience is not limited to criminal law. In July 2018, I started working as a senior civil litigation attorney at a plaintiff's firm in The Woodlands. I primarily handle cases involving breach of contract, breach of the common law duty of good faith and fair dealing, violations of consumer protection laws, and violations of the insurance code. I handle all aspects of litigation including, pre-suit demands, petitions, discovery (written and depositions), motions and pretrial and trial. I am admitted to practice civil law in every federal district court in Texas.
Why do you want this position?
I am seeking this bench to serve, protect citizens' rights, and see justice is done. Today we see a lack of respect for the sanctity of life, a lack of respect for law and order, and a lack of respect for our country. We see injustice and need someone to stand firm against the currents of unconstitutionality. I see this as a vocation to serve Montgomery County. I was asked to run for this bench by several people in our community who have actually witnessed my ability to uphold and enforce our laws while seeking justice. Through prayer and counsel from my wife, I am answering the call.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent?
Service. Experience. Temperament. These are the three attributes that set me apart from my opponent.
First, service: I am seeking this bench to serve our great community. This bench belongs to the people of the great state of Texas and Montgomery County, and I have spent my entire career, both professionally and privately serving them. In my career I have taken an extra oath to seek justice. As an assistant district attorney in Montgomery County for about a decade, I have made decisions that affect our entire community, decisions I never took lightly nor made without proper reflection and preparation. In my private life, I serve on the executive board for Montgomery County's Children's Advocacy Center, Children's Safe Harbor, where I help raise awareness and raise money to help child victims of physical and sexual abuse. I also volunteer at my church, St. Matthias in Magnolia, where I help teach youth classes, marriage classes, and lector. It is my hunger to serve that was the reason other lawyers in the community asked me to run for this bench.
Second, is experience. I have the right experience to be judge in a district court. The 457th District Court was created for one reason: docket management. I am the only candidate that has any district court docket management experience. As district court chief for both the 435th and 359th District Courts in Montgomery County, I was in charge of every case on the docket–upwards of 1,200 per year. The numbers show that month after month, we disposed of more cases than came in, effectively and efficiently reducing the docket size. I have worked in 16 out of 17 elected courts in Montgomery County in both civil and criminal law. I am a trial specialist that has tried the most important cases affecting Montgomery County, including capital murder, murder and sexual assault of children, and I tried these cases at the highest burden of proof with unanimous jury verdicts. As a senior civil litigator, I handle similar issues that will face the 457th, including discovery disputes and motions practice. I have handled civil law cases all over Texas in both state and federal courts. I am administered to practice civil law in every state court in Texas, as well as every federal district court in Texas, along with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. To achieve this, shows I have the requisite qualifications and am in good standing with the State Bar of Texas.
Which leads me to the last most important distinction between myself and my opponent, that being temperament. Judicial candidates are treated the same as judges while they are campaigning, and according to the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, judges are held to higher standards, as they should be. Even what the candidates do during extrajudicial activities affects what they do on the bench. Temperament is crucial because the courtroom is a place where everyone should be treated fairly and laws applied fairly. It is not a place for games, grudges, tomfoolery, nor tyrants. Most of my career has been spent in the spotlight, and I have demonstrated the level of integrity needed for this bench. On the contrary, since February 2020, my opponent has demonstrated he does not contain the requisite temperament. In just a few months of campaigning, my opponent has admitted to taking campaign literature from other candidates off of voter's properties and is currently under investigation for accosting our county judge by approaching and outnumbering him in a parking garage and throwing an egg at him. These are just a couple of incidents in my opponent's background that have many in our community concerned to bring their most important legal disputes in front of him. Even the people that have endorsed my opponent admit he is "too easily provoked," who "takes radical positions," and "can be overly critical publicly of groups and people who take positions opposite his." My opponent's behavior even caused the Patriots PAC to renounce their endorsement of him, stating his behavior is violative to the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct. I have not only proven I have the proper temperament, not only in this campaign, but in my career. I have kept my endorsements, and have inspired more voters to support me.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
As previously mentioned, the 457th District Court was created for one reason: Docket Management. To efficiently manage the docket it starts with hiring a professional, talented, hard working staff. I will also put in work. I will work Monday through Friday 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. I will also be available after hours not avoiding my on-call responsibilities. A docket control order will be issued in every case immediately following the filing of an answer. This docket control order will have hard and fast dates consistent with the local rules, providing the scheduling and deadlines for the entire age of the case. I will require both parties to engage in good faith mediation in an effort to dispose of the case pretrial. Dispositive motions dockets will be set by both in court and by submission, with quick rulings. I will also have status dockets to ensure cases are proceeding according to the docket control order.
Where can voters go for more information about you?
- Website: www.ElectVinceSantini.com
- Resume
Read more:
Texas Voters: Meet the Candidates Running for Judge in July Primary Runoffs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExxonMobil Sues California AG Bonta, Environmental Groups for Advanced Recycling 'Smear Campaign'
2 Judges: Meet the New Chief Justice and the GC Who Just Rose to the Bench
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions
- 2It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times
- 3Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 4SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 5Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250