Photo: think4photop/Shutterstock.comYIKES! 2 Lawyers Accused of Accidentally Helping Opposing Counsel Sign Up More Plaintiffs to Sue Client
The former client alleges the lawyers disclosed more names in discovery than they should have, and then opposing counsel signed up more plaintiffs to sue the company.
June 22, 2020 at 11:40 AM
3 minute read
Houston attorneys Kerry Notestine and Conor Kelly have denied all the allegations in a legal malpractice lawsuit that alleged they made a mistake in discovery that cost their oil and gas services company client lots of money.
The allegations help remind attorneys to closely review discovery materials before sending them to opposing counsel.
"Our official position is the claims are without merit. We are going to vigorously defend the claims," said Jeffrey W. Hellberg Jr., partner in Wick Phillips Gould & Martin in Dallas, who represents the defendants.
Notestine is a shareholder and Kelly is an associate in Littler Mendelson in Houston. The same plaintiff, New Tech Global Ventures, a global oil and gas services firm, sued Littler Mendelson and a Pittsburgh shareholder there in November 2019.
Hellberg said the case against the law firm was dismissed in late May, and a week later, New Tech sued the two individual lawyers.
Read more: Littler Hit With Negligence Suit for Providing Too Much Discovery
In an answer on Friday, Notestine and Kelly argued that the plaintiff sued them outside of the statute of limitations, and also that New Tech contributed to its own alleged damages. They say the company sued the wrong parties.
|Read their full answer:
New Tech's new lawsuit, filed May 26 in Harris County District Court, is very similar to its old case. The company alleges that the lawyers represented them in underlying litigation by an employee who brought Fair Labor Standards Act claims for himself and other similar "well site" supervisors.
In discovery, Notestine and Kelly were supposed to give plaintiffs counsel a list of names of other well site supervisors. New Tech alleged the lawyers also provided hundreds of names of "completion" supervisors.
Next, the plaintiffs lawyers signed up additional completion supervisors as plaintiffs.
In the new legal malpractice litigation, New Tech seeks to recover $180,000 it paid the lawyers, plus the money it spent on new lawyers who it said fixed the errors, and arbitration fees spent on the additional claims from completion supervisors. Among other damages, New Tech is asking the court to award all the settlement money it had to pay for the extra cases that came from the discovery disclosure.
Plaintiffs attorney Steven Duble of Houston didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
|Read the full petition:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Homegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute read
Energy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read
Houston Offshore Energy Firm Challenges Bonding Rule by Suing Insurers
4 minute read
Freeport LNG Explosion: Zachary Industrial Evades $400M Damages Claim in Bankruptcy Court
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
