Meet George Flint and Sarah Fox, Republican Candidates for Judge of Texas' 401st District Court in McKinney
George Flint, a partner in Scheef & Stone, and McKinney criminal-defense lawyer Sarah Fox are competing for the Republican nomination for the vacant bench in Collin County.
June 23, 2020 at 01:51 PM
8 minute read
The two judicial candidates in the runoff McKinney's 401st District Court have different ideas of the court's caseload and different arguments about how their experience makes them the better pick.
George Flint, a partner in Scheef & Stone, and McKinney criminal-defense lawyer Sarah Fox are competing for the Republican nomination for the vacant bench in Collin County. Whoever wins will go on to compete against Democratic candidate Tonya Holt in November.
Fox argues that 70% of the court's docket is made up of felony criminal cases and that her background as a prosecutor who is board certified in criminal law makes her more qualified. She also claims she's handled more jury trials.
"My opponent has never handled a criminal trial," Fox wrote. "My opponent is simply not a trial attorney."
But Flint claims that 80% of a general jurisdiction judge's time goes to family and civil cases, and he has 39 years of experience in those areas, while Fox has none. Flint says he's well-supported in the local legal community.
He has been "endorsed by two retired Court of Appeals Justices, all five of Collin County's Texas state representatives, the Collin County judge, and well-respected board certified members of the Collin County criminal, family and civil bars," he writes.
Texas Lawyer is publishing Q&As with judicial candidates in primary runoffs. Early voting is June 29 to July 10 and election day is July 14.
Here are the Q&As for Flint and Fox.
Read more: Texas Voters: Meet the Candidates Running for Judge in July Primary Runoffs
|
George Flint
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
B.S. from M.I.T. (1972-Management); M.B.A. from Wake Forest University (1974); J.D. from Southern Methodist University (1980); Associate Judge – Probate (Mental Health); arbitrator for Better Business Bureau; partner in litigation, corporate and real estate sections, Scheef & Stone; aV rated, Martindale-Hubbell.
Why do you want this position?
I believe that, if elected, I can use my 39 years of legal experience, as well as my life experience and judicial and political conservative philosophies to be an effective, efficient and excellent state judge for Collin County.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent?
The 401st District Court in Collin County is a court of general jurisdiction, hearing criminal, family and civil cases. Eighty percent of the time spent by general jurisdiction judges in Collin County is spent on family and civil cases. My opponent has no experience in family and civil cases. I have 39 years of experience in civil law, which includes many aspects of family law (including courtroom experience in trying personal injury, real estate, contract, commercial, employment, civil rights, business dispute, insurance, intellectual property and tort cases). I am a partner in the litigation section of Scheef & Stone, have been endorsed by two retired Court of Appeals justices, all five of Collin County's Texas state representatives, the Collin County judge, and well-respected board certified members of the Collin County criminal, family, and civil bars. I am invested in Collin County, having been a longtime resident of over 40 years, married for 44 years with grandchildren, all of whom are local to Collin County, active in my church and a proud Republican. I am a constitutional conservative, believe in the rule of law and will respect all people who appear in my court. I have a technology degree from M.I.T. and a master of business degree, as well as my law degree, which give me the ability to understand the complexities which confront society today and to deal with those complexities efficiently, effectively, and fairly. Finally, I have been endorsed by all the conservative organizations which have endorsed in this race to date –– Texas Right to Life, Texans for Courageous Courts, Patriot Texas, Texas Home School Coalition, Texas Values Action and the Collin County Conservative Republicans. I am the clear conservative choice for district judge, and I welcome anyone to visit my website, http://george4.judge.com, for further information and to contact me.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
- Heavier use of afternoon dockets
- Standing discovery, protective and scheduling orders
- Early scheduling conferences with counsel
- Reasonable time limits on presentation of evidence and argument
- Encouragement of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
Where can voters go for more information about you?
|
Sarah Fox
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
I began my career as a prosecutor for the Collin County District Attorneys Office and prosecuted both misdemeanor and felony criminal cases for almost five years. Since that time I have been in private criminal defense practice. I have handled every level of offense from traffic tickets to murder cases, and have experience in state, federal, and appellate courts. I am also board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Why do you want this position?
I was raised to believe any gifts God gives us are to be used for the betterment of our community, and I've lived my entire adult life honoring that upbringing. I began by serving our community as an assistant district attorney under the guidance of Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis. As a criminal defense attorney, I have served by performing pro bono services to individuals and clients of The Family Place domestic violence shelter. When Judge Mark Rusch announced that he was retiring from the 401st District Court, a court which holds a docket of 70% criminal cases, I again felt called to use the gifts and experiences God has given me to fill a specific need in our community. Because no other candidate in this race has any criminal law experience, there is a void being left in the 401st for someone with the background and experience to fully serve the citizens of Collin County.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent?
I am better suited than my opponent for this bench for three reasons. First and primarily, the 401st is a court whose docket is 70% serious felony criminal cases. My opponent has never handled a criminal trial, while I am a former felony prosecutor and board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Second, in all types of legal matters the court hears, the judge is responsible for overseeing contested hearings and trials on a weekly basis. My opponent is simply not a trial attorney; his practice lies outside of the courtroom. In my 10 years as an attorney, I have already tried literally dozens more jury trials than my opponent has in his 39 years, and I have thousands of hours spent arguing in the courtroom. Finally, as a lifelong Republican, it is important to me to protect the conservative values of the Collin County judiciary, and it is no secret that the Democratic Party is trying desperately to win seats such as the 401st in the general election. Because my opponent is constitutionally barred from seeking a second term, he would leave the bench of the 401st in a very vulnerable position in the 2024 election for attack by the Democratic Party. I, by contrast, could and would continue to serve the citizens of Collin County and the Republican Party for decades to come.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
It is important to utilize your court staff to help keep scheduling orders in compliance and to have the expectation among attorneys that cases should be moved quickly and effectively. One of the best ways I've seen that goal accomplished in practice is by requiring counsel to approach the judge after a certain amount of time has passed on a case, thus creating an atmosphere of accountability while at the same time keeping the judge informed of how the docket is moving.
Where can voters go for more information about you?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 2Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 3While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 4The Definition of Special Employment
- 5People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250