Jeff Propst, Kevin Willhelm Compete in Runoff for Judge of 104th District Court in Abilene
Jeff Propst and Kevin Willhelm are dueling in the Republican runoff for the 104th District Court in Abilene. The winner will get the bench since there's no Democratic candidate running in that race in November.
June 24, 2020 at 04:28 PM
6 minute read
While one candidate for Taylor County's 104th District Court argues he has more expertise in criminal law that makes him the better pick, his opponent claims to have represented more criminal law clients and handled more criminal jury trials.
Jeff Propst and Kevin Willhelm are dueling in the Republican runoff for the 104th District Court in Abilene. Whoever wins will get the bench since there's no Democratic candidate in November.
Willhelm argues that he's practiced law for longer, represented more clients in criminal cases and handled greater numbers of criminal and civil trials during his career.
"I have better perspective, temperament and discernment through my legal experience as well as my life experience," Willhelm wrote. "My career and my life exhibit consistency, strength and integrity."
But Propst, noting that the 104th District Court's caseload is made up of 70% criminal cases, argued that his criminal law expertise better qualifies him for the bench.
"I am the only candidate who has both prosecuted and defended criminal cases," wrote Propst, who is board certified in criminal law. "I have also handled many civil law cases, giving me a well-rounded background for this court."
Texas Lawyer is publishing Q&As with judicial candidates in primary runoff elections. Early voting is June 29 to July 10, and election day is July 14.
Here are the Q&As for Propst and Willhelm.
Read more: Texas Voters: Meet the Candidates Running for Judge in July Primary Runoffs
|
Jeff Propst
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
I have been licensed to practice law for almost 12 years. In that time, I have handled all sorts of legal matters, both civil and criminal. My primary experience is in criminal law, which accounts for about 70% of the docket of the 104th District Court. I have prosecuted and defended felony cases and developed a word-of-mouth business based on hard work.
Why do you want this position?
Abilene, Taylor County, and the Big Country are part of who I am. My family settled about 20 miles north of Abilene in the 1800s. I care deeply about this community and what it becomes, and I want to serve its citizens and help keep it a great place to live and raise a family.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent in the election?
My expertise is in criminal law, and that is the primary area of law that the 104th District Court handles. About 70% of the cases in the 104th District Court are criminal or criminal-related. I am the only candidate who has both prosecuted and defended criminal cases. In addition, I am board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. I have also handled many civil law cases, giving me a well-rounded background for this court.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
I am going to bring to the bench the same work ethic that has allowed me to build a successful practice over these last 12 years. I am also going to look for new ways to bring cases to trial faster and prevent long delays.
Where can voters go for more information about you?
- Website: jeffpropstcampaign.com
|
Kevin Willhelm
What is a brief biography of work experience, educational qualifications and career honors that you want voters to know about?
More than 27 years trial experience in state and federal courts; experienced in criminal, civil, family and other major areas of law; admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States; life fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation; member, The College of the State Bar of Texas; member of Mensa.
Why do you want this position?
I want to serve our community. I want to keep our community safe, improve our community and provide justice for individuals in Taylor County.
How are you different or better suited for the bench than your opponent?
I am better suited for the bench in many ways.
I am more experienced than my opponent in several ways. I've been practicing trial law for more than 27 years in all areas heard by the 104th District Court. My opponent has been practicing only ll years and primarily criminal law. Additionally, in the past three years in Taylor County alone, I've represented more than 575 clients in criminal cases verses my opponent representing only 91 clients. In our respective careers, I've represented more than seven times as many clients as my opponent. Further, I've handled 56 criminal jury trials and 15 civil trials while my opponent has had 27 criminal trials and only three civil trials.
I'm vested in our community. I've been on the board of several nonprofits during the past 21 years including Disability Resources Inc., Communities in Schools and Kicks for Kids. I am a member of Rotary Club of Abilene and Rotary International. I am a deacon at Oldham Lane Church of Christ.
I have better perspective, temperament and discernment through my legal experience as well as my life experience. I've been married for 31 years to Stacy Willhelm. We have three children and two college graduates: Austin (25), Dillon (22) and Ella (16).
My career and my life exhibit consistency, strength and integrity.
How would you go about managing this court's docket efficiently and effectively?
I've owned my law firm for more than 20 years. I've learned how do get things accomplished efficiently and effectively by providing consistent, diligent effort on a daily basis with a commitment to excellence. I would manage the court's docket by providing a consistent schedule for handling cases. I would monitor timelines to make sure no case languishes without getting heard in a reasonable time. I would conduct status conferences, often referred to as docket calls, to organize and prioritize cases for trial or resolution.
Where can voters go for more information about you?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEnergy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute readTexas AG Paxton Stops Biden's Spousal Parole For Undocumented Immigrants
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250