The Current State of IP During the Pandemic: A Q&A With NZ Carr Law Office's Nan Carr
Nan Carr, an intellectual property attorney with NZ Carr Law Office in Houston, recently spoke with Texas Lawyer about the state of intellectual property…
June 26, 2020 at 04:55 AM
3 minute read
Nan Carr, an intellectual property attorney with NZ Carr Law Office in Houston, recently spoke with Texas Lawyer about the state of intellectual property law during the COVID-19 pandemic and what we can expect once the virus is vanquished.
What's happening in your practice area of IP law?
Nan Carr: We are a small boutique firm mainly handling patent and trademark prosecution. We also do some opinion work and provide litigation support. About half of our clients are from Asia. The pandemic in Asia coincided with the Spring Festival, which is a traditional downtime for business there. We had anticipated that our Asian clients would slow down during this period, so it did not come as a complete shock to us. Most of our Asian clients extended their Spring Festival downtime for about a month to cope with pandemic and have since picked up their business. Some U.S. clients were hit by surprise and forced to cope with various urgent matters in their operations. But it appears that most U.S. clients have found their footing. We provided support to our clients as they needed during the past few months and we expect work to pick up again soon.
Is the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) responding at its usual rate or do you think the review of these applications (and other procedures) is taking more time under current circumstances?
We haven't felt any obvious delays from the USPTO in our dealings with the Office. We are diligent in keeping our clients informed with updates of their pending applications and any resolutions from the USPTO.
What should IP attorneys be doing in response to the changes that have occurred since December 2019?
As patent prosecution attorneys, we are lucky to be able to do most of our work remotely from our clients, colleagues, and the USPTO. The pandemic has forced us to collaborate even more online. It is a good opportunity to get familiar with technology and further reduce our overhead to serve our clients more efficiently.
What questions should clients or potential clients be asking due to changes in their business, the courts and the process of filing patents?
We noticed that some clients have been withholding spending decisions on IP matters. We would encourage our clients and potential clients to involve us with their decision process, so we can provide our input to prioritize their spending, and to come up with cost- effective solutions without sacrificing the value of their core IP assets.
Nan Carr is a well-rounded IP attorney with NZ Carr Law Office in Houston. She counsels clients for their needs on patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret protection. Using her broad spectrum of IP experience, Nan has involved in developing or assessing client's intellectual property strategy. She strives to understand the client's business model, technology, products, competitors, market activity, opportunities for growth, existing IP portfolio and more to help clients develop and protect their IP rights.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 2On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
- 3Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 4Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
- 5How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250