Expecting a Case Backlog in Texas Courts? That's Not Happening ... Yet
Texas litigators who expected COVID-19 to grow court backlogs may be surprised to learn that Texas courts' clearance rates have actually improved during the pandemic. But it doesn't mean the Lone Star State's judiciary is in the clear.
July 01, 2020 at 12:16 PM
6 minute read
Trial lawyers might expect to see a growing case backlog because of the way the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Texas courts.
But they would be wrong—at least for now.
Case data from the Texas Office of Court Administration shows that—rather than a growing backlog—Texas courts have increased their clearance rates during the first three months of the pandemic.
Texas Lawyer analyzed data from March, April and May that comprised civil and family law cases in both district courts and county courts-at-law across the whole state.
One of the biggest findings: It's true that Texas courts became less efficient at disposing of cases during the pandemic.
In March, courts statewide disposed of 26,038 civil and family cases. By May, the disposition number had dropped to 17,972, which is a significant 31% decline.
But a drop in new cases meant the dockets didn't become congested during the pandemic, despite courthouse closures. During that time, the number of new case filings dropped significantly. In March, there were 28,953 new cases filed, but by May, the number had fallen to 17,138—a 41% decrease.
The result was that at the end of March, there were 564,595 active pending cases, and the total dropped by 11% to 505,051 by the end of May.
|
View the numbers:
Source: Texas Office of Court Administration. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
|
'Courts have been active'
The good news: The courts' clearance rate actually improved from 90% in March to 105% in May.
"It shows that Texas judges during the pandemic—the courts have been active and at work and working with litigants and attorneys. They have been moving cases," said David Slayton, administrative director of the Texas Office of Court Administration. "I think it shows the value of the Zoom remote hearings that we've been using in the state. We've been able to not only move the cases coming into the courts, we actually started digging into some of the backlog already in existence when the pandemic hit."
Slayton noted that new case filings were down across the board, regardless of practice area, but that some dropped more than others. Debt cases, child support actions, tax delinquency matters and protective order cases decreased the most, he said.
Baker Botts partner Tom Phillips of Austin said he thinks litigators are just waiting to file their cases because the Texas Supreme Court has extended the statute of limitations during the pandemic.
The court's latest emergency order, issued Monday, extended the filing deadlines to Sept. 15.
Phillips, a former chief justice of the Supreme Court, said there's another explanation too.
"We saw some of this after the 2008 to 2009 crisis: People don't want to spend the money it takes to litigate, and they work harder to settle—find some sort of business solution, or they work it out informally," he said.
|Future backlog?
But although courts' clearance rates are great now, it doesn't mean the Texas judiciary is in the clear.
If the case filing numbers rise to normal levels again, but the case disposition numbers are still down, that would create a backlog.
"I think that hasn't happened yet, but I think that's coming," said Houston trial lawyer Rebeca Huddle, who expects an uptick in new filings whenever the statute-of-limitations deadline extension expires.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250