Houston Judge Dismisses Suit That Alleged Offit Kurman, Partner Overbilled
U.S. District Judge Sim Lake of the Southern District of Texas signed a final judgment Tuesday, on forum non conveniens grounds, that dismissed a suit filed by Houston online retailer LuxeYard and its owner.
July 01, 2020 at 05:23 PM
2 minute read
A federal judge in Houston dismissed a lawsuit that alleged "unconscionable conduct," including overbilling and negligence, by Maryland-based Offit Kurman and a partner in Philadelphia.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Sim Lake of the Southern District of Texas granted a defense motion asking to have the suit dismissed on forum non conveniens grounds. Judge Lake also denied the plaintiffs' motion to remand the suit back to Texas state court where it was originally filed.
Lake found in a memorandum opinion and order that a clause in the engagement letter that plaintiff Amir Mireskandari signed dictates that any disputes would be filed in state court in Delaware.
Houston lawyer Lance Kassab, who represents the plaintiffs—Houston online retailer LuxeYard and its owner Mireskandari—said he is discussing with his client whether to refile the suit.
Defense attorney Glenn LeMay, a partner in Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani in Houston who represents Offit Kurman and partner Frank Noyes, did not immediately return a telephone message seeking comment. The firm did not respond to an email requesting comment.
LuxeYard and Mireskandari alleged in its complaint in federal court in May that Offit Kurman and Noyes overbilled them for work while defending them in underlying litigation and also mishandled it, which resulted in them having to pay $450,000 in settlements in other lawsuits.
They sought more than $1 million in damages.
The suit alleged overbilling, block billing and duplicative billing, as well as fee churning.
|Read More:
Houston Retailer Alleges Offit Kurman Overbilled for Defense Work, E-Discovery
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250