Tarrant County Spent Nearly $244,000 to Reopen Courthouses With COVID-19 Precautions
An open records request showed that so far, Tarrant County has spent a total of $243,695 on the masks, gloves, wipes, thermometers and more that it needed to reopen its courthouses.
July 02, 2020 at 12:42 PM
4 minute read
To guard against coronavirus transmission, Tarrant County has installed Plexiglas dividers around the witness stands in its courtrooms, such as this divider in the 360th District Court. Photo: Judge Patricia Baca Bennett
The face masks, gloves, wipes, thermometers and other gear that courts in Fort Worth needed to guard against COVID-19 spread and reopen safely have so far cost Tarrant County at least $244,000.
Counties across Texas have needed the same type of gear and equipment to lessen the risk of COVID-19 infection as they welcomed lawyers, litigants and other court participants back into courthouses for some limited in-person proceedings in June. Although the largest Texas counties may be able to cover the extra costs, smaller counties could struggle to find the money in their budgets.
Texas Lawyer has done a series of open records requests for invoices and payment records for the COVID-19 precautions now seen around Texas courthouses. Tarrant County released a spreadsheet and invoices that detail its spending. Meanwhile, adjacent Dallas County refused to release the records, arguing they are "judicial records" not subject to the Texas Public Information Act. Texas Lawyer has filed a complaint over that determination.
The records show that so far, Tarrant County has spent a total of $243,695 on the items it needed to reopen its courthouses.
Explore the spending: Hover over the pie chart to view dollar figures.
Source: Texas Public Information Act request to Tarrant County. Graphic: Angela Morris/ALM
Face masks made up the bulk of the spending: It was $155,673, or 64% of the total. That included surgical masks, KN-95 masks, reusable masks, and child-sized masks. Other big-ticket items included $38,400 for Plexiglas and $33,823 for stanchions, which are poles with ropes used for crowd control that are often seen in airport security lines.
Frequent wipe-downs
Judge Patricia Baca Bennett of Tarrant County's 360th Family District Court, who's been holding limited in-person proceedings for about a month now, said that she's pleased with all of the precautions that the courts have been using.
"Tarrant County facilities is wiping down: Every time someone opens a door knob, it's wiped down. Every time someone goes before a microphone, we clean it off or spray it," Bennett explained. "We have plenty of masks, we have thermometers, we have gloves, we have the Purell. They have it all for us."
She said $244,000 isn't a lot to spend if you consider the number of courts that Tarrant County runs.
"It surprised me that it was that low," Bennett said.
She said she counted 63 total courts, made up of civil, family and criminal district courts, plus their associate judges and criminal magistrates, county courts-at-law, probate courts and child support courts and justice-of-the peace courts. That would bring the cost per court down to nearly $3,900.
Budget woes
Although Texas' larger counties, including Tarrant, may be able to swallow those costs, it's different in the Lone Star State's smaller, cash-strapped counties, according to Hector Gomez, court security director for the Texas Office of Court Administration.
"It is going to place a hardship on the counties. It's an unanticipated expense or cost," said Gomez, who's been assisting counties across Texas to figure out how to secure personal protective equipment. "They have to now find that money in their budgets, move it or forgo the cost of what they were going to look at expending."
Gomez added that all of the gear and equipment that Tarrant County has been buying is exactly the "textbook, standardized equipment" that he has seen other counties requesting for their courthouses.
"They have to go seek this equipment, these supplies, at open-source vendors. If there's a supply-and-demand issue to consider, and hard-to-find items, obviously there would be a cost to pay for it," Gomez said. "When there is a run on supplies, prices tend to go up."
Related story:
Q&A: Texas Judges Are Searching for Protective Gear Before Reopening Courthouses
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/87/55/76d138e54062b9440df29f3bdc1d/lanora-pettit.jpg)
![Texas Asks Trump DOJ to Reject Housing Enforcement Texas Asks Trump DOJ to Reject Housing Enforcement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f5/90/b8a7164e41689d98a4b3f8d60ec7/harvey-tropical-hurricane-767x633.jpg)
![A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/texaslawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2023/09/AI-Machine-learning-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250