Texas Firms Shone in 2019 Amid Increasingly Crowded Field
A group of 17 high-grossing Texas firms brought in 3.6% more revenue in 2019 than in 2018, showing the strength of the robust Texas market and strategic growth outside of Texas.
July 02, 2020 at 02:53 PM
5 minute read
Before the coronavirus pandemic slowed business, large Texas firms posted solid financials in 2019, with 17 high-grossing firms bringing in a total of $5.361 billion in revenue, up 3.6% from $5.174 billion for the same group of firms in 2018.
This year's Annual Report on Firm Finance includes 17 firms based in Texas, including nine firms on the Am Law 200, and other firms contending for that ranking.
The fact that total revenue for the 17 firms grew in 2019 is an indication that the Texas firms were well-positioned to take advantage of Texas economic strength, as well as opportunities elsewhere.
Ten of the firms brought in more revenue in 2019 than the prior year, with Baker Botts, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin and Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr each posting double-digit percentage increases in revenue.
Most of the revenue declines were small, except at Kane Russell Coleman Logan, which lost 18% of its lawyers at the end of 2018—a group split off to form Mayer LLP—but the firm did improve its revenue per lawyer and profits per partner in 2019.
The mostly rosy financials for the Texas firms come in a year when out-of-state firms continued to open offices in the Lone Star state, luring lawyers—and clients—away from those founded in the state. 2019 was the third year in a row of robust activity for new office openings in the Texas market, which has affected the Texas firms' hold on business.
Managing partners of some large Texas firms said energy deals, particularly capital markets work, slowed down in 2019, but restructuring work started to pick up by the end of the year. Some practice areas were exceedingly busy during the year, including real estate, tax, infrastructure, finance, renewables, and cybersecurity and privacy, and some litigation, according to firm leaders. Many of the firms focused on hiring lateral partners in busy practice areas.
Texas Lawyer's Annual Report on Firm Finance includes financials from 17 large and high-grossing firms in Texas that also appeared on the list last year.
Like gross revenue, net income also improved for the group of firms. The combined net income was $2.258 billion, up 4.1.% when compared with $2.169 billion for the firms last year.
Munsch Hardt's net income increased by 20.7%, the largest increase among the firms. Net increased by 16.1% at trial firm Susman Godfrey, by 15% at Chamberlain Hrdlicka and by 10.9% at Vinson & Elkins. Net income fell at eight of the firms, when compared with 2018, but largely by small margins.
RPL and PEP improved overall at the firms in 2019. RPL averaged $847,000, up by 0.8% when compared with $840,000 on average in 2018. PEP also inched up at $1,347 million, up 1.3% when compared with $1,330 million the prior year.
PEP exceeded $1 million at 10 of the firms.
Those four measures in the Texas Lawyer Annual Report on Firm Finance—gross revenue, net income, RPL and PEP—help describe each firm's financial performance and provide a means for comparison. Gross revenue is used to rank the firms and serves as the master list for the report.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld again tops the gross revenue chart with $1.135 billion, up 5.9% when compared with 2018. Revenue at eight of the firms was higher in 2019 than in 2018, and it was lower at nine.
Akin Gump also topped the net income chart, with $464 million, up 4.3% from the year before. Net income was higher at nine of the 17 firms, and lower at eight of them.
Susman Godfrey posted the highest RPL of $1.709 million, although it was down 11.3% from 2018, since the firm added lawyers in 2019. Thirteen of the firms improved RPL in 2019, and four saw it decline.
Vinson & Elkins topped the PEP chart, with $2.798 million, up 11.2% when compared with 2018. PEP improved at 10 of the firms in 2019, but it dropped at seven.
The report also includes a firm-by-firm analysis that helps explain financial results at each of the firms.
The inclusion of comments by firm leaders in this report does not indicate that a particular firm cooperated with the gathering of financial information. Lawyers simply responded to questions about work and developments at their firms in 2019. Texas Lawyer does not identify which firms provide financial information to ALM and which do not.
Click Here to View Gross Revenue by Firm
Click Here to View Revenue Per Lawyer by Firm
Click Here to View Profits Per Partner by Firm
Click Here to View Net Income by Firm
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250