Texas Bar Board Pledges Action to Erase Systemic Racism, Boost Diversity After Marathon Meeting Over Larry McDougal's Comments
The board of directors of the State Bar of Texas created two new groups to research action to erase systemic racism in the bar and promote diversity and inclusion, and asked bar committees to study two specific proposals that came from public comments.
July 28, 2020 at 02:32 PM
6 minute read
In a marathon board meeting on Monday, the State Bar of Texas voted to take action to start healing divisions in the bar in the wake of online comments by President Larry McDougal.
During the 12-hour Zoom meeting, McDougal pledged to present his plan to address the offense given to many minority attorneys and allies from his words, but the bar board indicated it wouldn't sit idly by and wait on him.
Bar leaders created two new groups to research how to erase systemic racism in the bar and promote diversity and inclusion in the legal profession, and also asked bar committees to start a deeper study on two specific proposals that came from public comments in the meeting.
McDougal said at the meeting that he has been working to put a plan together of the actions that he will take to heal the division from his online comments. He has met twice with the bar's African American Lawyers Section and talked with bar directors about implicit bias training for lawyers and other programs to launch, he said.
"My goal and where I'm going with this is to do better—to move our bar in a different direction," McDougal said. "What can we do that is different? Things that will work? Things that will be inclusive, things that will bring people together? Those things do not happen overnight."
He said he is gathering his ideas so that he can present a plan that is the best it can be. McDougal said he would address what has happened, "not run from it."
"I want to lead this bar. I stuck my foot in my mouth, and I know it. I don't deny it," McDougal said. "I have my blindness. That's probably why I did that, because I didn't see. But I have learned a lot."
McDougal must come up with a preliminary plan by Sept. 24 under a proposal that the bar board passed unanimously.
McDougal seconded a motion by Randy Sorrels, immediate past president of the bar, to set a deadline for McDougal to present a preliminary plan to the board about "how he intends to address the division that has occurred over the last 17 days," Sorrels said. Under the motion, McDougal would have to present his idea by Sept. 24 and then set his plan in place by the January 2021 board meeting.
Sorrels accepted an amendment by Director Steve Fischer that said the board would have discretion to extend McDougal's deadline for the preliminary plan, if McDougal's health issues required more time.
McDougal recently underwent cancer surgery, according to an email by his spokeswoman, Christine Haas.
|Working group and task force
The board also voted to take action on a new task force and working group that will study ideas that came from the controversy over McDougal's comments.
The board unanimously passed a proposal by President-elect Sylvia Borunda Firth to create a task force on diversity, equity and inclusion. She said that something bad brought the board together for the meeting, but now there's been a good result: they have recommitted themselves to the work of diversity and inclusion. The task force will follow the words with action, said Firth, who pledged to dedicate her year as president to the issue.
"There is a will to make positive steps in the right direction," Firth said. "Let's get started."
Unanimous approval also followed a motion by directors Carmen Roe and Adam Schramek to create a working group of board members who will review all of the written and oral public comments that were submitted for the meeting, discuss recommendations for action by the bar, and identify any potential legal issues that must be analyzed. The working group will report back to the board about the proposals that the bar should adopt, or ideas that need more discussion.
Later in the meeting, Firth also moved successfully to ask legal counsel to identify potential legal precedent that would apply to recommendations for action by the African American Lawyers Section and the National Bar Association.
|Implicit bias training and anti-discrimination rule
Two of the recommendations by public speakers in the meeting will move forward to be studied by bar committees now.
The board unanimously passed a motion by Director Jason Smith to request the bar's Minimum Continuing Legal Education Committee to consider adding an implicit bias training course to each lawyer's annual CLE requirements. Under the motion, the committee will have to report a recommendation to the bar board at its January 2021 meeting. The board also voted to approve a motion by Director Lucy Forbes that all directors take implicit bias training before the end of 2020.
Later in the meeting, Smith proposed a motion to request the bar's committee on disciplinary rules and referenda to consider whether to adopt American Bar Association model rule 8.4(g), which would prohibit attorneys' discriminatory conduct in all areas of the practice of law, rather than just in adjudicatory proceedings, as under the current Texas rules. His motion passed unanimously.
Another proposal that the board approved by Schramek requires two bar committees to study how to improve the vetting process for future president-elect candidates, and find ways to make sure lawyers get better information on candidates before voting.
Fischer, the sole no vote on the vetting proposal, said he didn't oppose vetting candidates regarding racist statements, but he was afraid the vetting process would be used to ask candidates if they are "pro bar and against reform."
"Who is going to stop them from saying, 'We want to vet people who say the bar is great, and there is nothing they do wrong," Fischer said. "I'm against it."
Related stories:
Lawyers Call On Texas Bar President to Resign Over Black Lives Matter Comments
McDougal Must Go? Directors Call for Texas Bar President's Ouster Amid #BLM Controversy
Amid Controversy, Texas Minority Lawyers Call for Action Against Racism in Profession
'Shame Is Not Strong Enough': Texas Bar Meeting Sees 61 Speakers Line Up to Address Larry McDougal's Online Comments
Bar Director Proposes Stripping Larry McDougal of His Texas Bar Spokesman Role
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250