Roommates No More: Houston Civil and Criminal Judges Have Their Own Courtrooms Back
After three years of sharing courtrooms with civil district judges, Harris County criminal district judges have moved back into the repaired Harris County Criminal Justice Center, which shuttered after Hurricane Harvey in 2017.
July 29, 2020 at 12:58 PM
4 minute read
Criminal district judges in Harris County are back in their own courthouse for the first time since Hurricane Harvey left it inoperable three years ago.
The civil district judges who since 2017 have shared their courtrooms and chambers with the displaced criminal district judges also got their own spaces back in June, when the Harris County Criminal Justice Center reopened for its judges.
"Everybody is glad to have their own courtroom back. Everyone is glad to have their own chambers back," said 152nd Civil District Judge Robert Schaffer, the local administrative judge of Harris County. "It's that comfort level: You don't have to go check a schedule to see if you can go use the courtroom."
Keith Cartwright of Courtroom Concepts, a Houston litigation support company, said it's been a long time coming for civil and criminal judges to no longer share courtrooms.
"I think it will certainly speed up the case scheduling going forward for both sides, for criminal and civil," Cartwright said. "I think it's a plus for Harris County, and it's certainly a plus for all trial lawyers in Houston."
|Under Water
Hurricane Harvey dropped 60 inches of rain on Houston, shattering national storm records and leaving the criminal courthouse essentially under water. The basement and first floor flooded, destroying critical building infrastructure like pumps, the electrical system and networking equipment, explained Rich Elwood, division manager of construction programs in Harris County's Public Infrastructure Corp.
Forced to move out, the criminal judges bunked with their civil counterparts in the Harris County Civil Courthouse. Criminal and civil judges shared chambers and courtrooms by coordinating their schedules so that one judge was booked to use a courtroom at a time.
Sharing courtrooms after Harvey slowed down cases from moving on judges' dockets, Schaffer said. Now, they're dealing with a double-whammy of COVID-19 pausing jury trials since March.
With these obstacles, Harris County judges will benefit from the greater freedom to schedule matters in their own courtrooms.
"I don't think we can resolve the Harvey and COVID situation in a month or six months—It will take some time," Schaffer said.
He added that judges will really move their dockets faster once they can schedule jury trials again. The Texas Supreme Court has prohibited jury trials through Sept. 1, except for approved experimental trials.
"Cases settle on the courthouse steps," he said. "The jury drives what goes on in the courthouse, to a huge extent."
|Construction Continues
Elwood, the construction manager, said that all of the carpet and paint in the criminal courthouse is new. They have moved as much as the building's infrastructure out of the basement and first floor, to higher floors, so they won't be impacted in future floods.
Recovering from Harvey took a long time because the storm was so destructive, he noted. So many government functions were impacted, and in the first year, the county focused on restarting them as best as possible. In the second year, discussions occurred about the best use of the criminal courthouse. In the third year, construction crews started the work. Elwood estimated they have about two more years left until completion.
Elwood explained that they are building five new elevators and reconfiguring the first floor lobby to allow for better flow of public traffic. The county also plans to construct a flood wall to lessen the flood risk from future storms. For particularly noisy jobs, construction crews will work on nights and weekends to lessen the impact on court business, he said.
Schaffer said the criminal judges needed to return to the building now, rather than waiting for all of the construction to finish. Being back in their own courtooms will allow the criminal judges to work more efficiently to reduce the jail population because they can hold more plea and bond reduction hearings, he explained. Even with the availability of remote hearings, the judges find it easier to work from the courthouse.
"It puts a little pressure on the building, because the lower floors are still under construction, and the elevators are still being built," Schaffer said. "But I think it's more efficient for judges to have access to their courtrooms, and do the work they need to do."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Has a Lot More than a Tornetta Appeal to Resolve in Delaware
- 2Case Will Test If Wrongful-Death Suit Can Be Brought for Fetus
- 3Venezuelan Man Convicted in Laken Riley's Killing Asks for a New Trial
- 4'I Had a Great Run': Longtime Brooklyn Civil Administrative Judge Lawrence Knipel to Step Down
- 5The Third Branch May Be Our Best Resort
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250