Reunification Therapy: The Legal Angles
The purpose of this article is not to take sides. Rather, it is to investigate what may lead to the need for reunification therapy, Elisa Reiter and Daniel Pollack write.
November 18, 2020 at 04:51 PM
6 minute read
Aside from cases of abuse or neglect, divorcing parents are usually awarded maximum time with their children. In some cases, one or both parents, and even members of their extended or blended families, attempt to alienate or estrange their children's affections from the other parent. Such estrangement can sometimes be the result of malice by one of the parents, creating legal implications as well as necessitating psychodynamic interventions. Every family is different. Each one is complex in its own way. Whether alienation or estrangement, acts or omissions that lead to the need for reunification therapy include:
- Children aligning with one parent against the other parent at every front.
- An aligned parent constantly calling and emailing the children during the other parent's periods of possession, with the intent of creating an appearance that there is something for the children to fear while in the possession of the rejected parent.
- Being consistently negative over a long period of time toward a rejected parent.
- Condoning a child cutting off personal, email or telephonic contact with the rejected parent.
- Empowering young children to make adult decisions, such as giving them permission to criticize, use physical force, or to behave inappropriately when in the rejected parent's possession.
- Encouraging a child to lie or to keep secrets.
- Engaging in black-and-white thinking in lieu of coming to terms on issues as co-parents should.
- Inability to behave civilly toward the other parent in the children's presence (phone calls, exchanges of possession, or at shared venues such as the children's extracurricular activities).
- Spitefully being at cross purposes regarding the children's education, health and welfare.
Some have lauded and some have lambasted reunification therapy as a process to assist the parent-child relationship be reestablished and rebuilt. The purpose of this article is not to take sides. Rather, it is to investigate what may lead to the need for reunification therapy.
In "Divorce Poison," Dr. Richard Warshak opines that lies should be confronted as quickly as feasible to avoid creating false memories that may prove difficult to expunge from the minds of young, impressionable children.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21 5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/05/AdobeStock_329141900-767x633.jpg)
5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Read the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read![Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/07/Trump-Smith-767x633-1.jpg)
Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250