Managing ESG Risks in the Aviation Industry
As environmental, social and governance-related issues continue to be a focus of investors and other stakeholders, we expect to see industry participants continuing to explore innovative ways to reduce their carbon emissions and mitigate ESG risks, say Kevin Lewis, Bart Biggers and Heather Palmer, attorneys with Sidley Austin.
March 31, 2021 at 10:59 AM
6 minute read
COVID-19 has left many of us reminiscing about travel—flights to family or foreign locations, and even work trips have taken on a rosy glow. The past few years have brought another concept into sharper focus—a goal of bluer skies and greener pastures through reduced carbon emissions. Investors, shareholders, employees, customers and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on aviation companies managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, including climate change and carbon emissions. In recent years, ESG-related issues in aviation have received ever-growing global attention, with Europe in particular focusing on air travel carbon emissions. Even with COVID-19 significantly curtailing air travel, airlines continue to focus on managing ESG risks. As customers steadily return to the skies, key considerations for the aviation industry to enhance their ESG strategies will include the scope of their carbon emissions, technological advances in aircraft and engine design, alternative fuel development, and the use of carbon credits or offsets to mitigate carbon emissions.
When a company seeks to reduce its carbon footprint as part of a broader ESG strategy, it will typically prepare a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory quantifying and classifying the company's GHG emissions. GHG emissions are categorized into three scopes: Scope 1 covers direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (e.g., fuel combustion from aircraft and fleet vehicles) – these constitute the largest portion of GHG emissions in the aviation industry, accounting for approximately 2% of global emissions. Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from consumption of purchased electricity, and Scope 3 covers all other indirect, uncontrolled emissions occurring in a company's value chain (e.g., employee commuting or business travel). While most aviation initiatives are aimed at reducing Scope 1 aircraft emissions, industry participants are finding opportunities to reduce Scope 2 emissions through energy efficiency initiatives, and Scope 3 emissions through improved designs and processes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250