The transition from academic writing to legal writing is one of the most difficult transitions faced by young attorneys. While law school attempts to teach legal writing, many students may leave the classroom feeling unprepared to implement their new skills – but this struggle is not unique and even experienced attorneys spend years honing their skills.

Part of the challenge is that writing is deeply subjective. Of course, there are countless books and articles (such as the one you are reading) which attempt to provide clarity. Because I wanted guidance from practicing attorneys, I surveyed a few attorney colleagues for their opinions on what makes good (and bad) legal writing. Below are 10 takeaways from their responses.

  1. Know your audience.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]