Texas Joins the #MeToo Movement, Expanding Employer Liability for Sexual Harassment Claims
This is a significant expansion of liability from the current standard, under which employers with fewer than 15 employees are not covered. Thus, small businesses and even families employing domestic help are encompassed within these laws.
September 16, 2021 at 10:51 AM
5 minute read
Texas is making waves due to its new anti-sexual harassment laws, effective Sept. 1. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) recently signed the two bills, SB 45 and HB 21, into law. SB 45 expands employer and individual executive liability for sexual harassment claims, and HB 21 lengthens the statute of limitations from 180 days to 300 days. This article explores these new laws, the potential impact on employers, and recommendations for best practices.
Overview and Potential Impact of SB 45 and HB 21
Although no judges have interpreted the laws yet, the four major potential areas of expansion of liability are described below.
- All employers are covered. An employer is defined as one who employs "one or more employees." This is a significant expansion of liability from the current standard, under which employers with fewer than 15 employees are not covered. Thus, small businesses and even families employing domestic help are encompassed within these laws.
- The new Texas Sexual Harassment Act potentially creates individual liability for managers. An employer is also defined as someone who "acts directly in the interests of any employer in relation to an employee." Texas has never before had express statutory liability for individual managers or executives for harassment claims.
- The new act potentially creates liability for failing to take action quickly after a report of sexual harassment. An "unlawful employment practice" occurs if there is sexual harassment of an employee "and the employer or employer's agents or supervisors (1) know or should have known that the conduct constituting sexual harassment was occurring; and (2) fail to take immediate and appropriate corrective action." Thus, under a negligence standard, a supervisor may be held personally liable for an employee's actions if he fails to take immediate corrective action.
- The new act lengthens the statute of limitations from 180 to 300 days. Again, no courts have interpreted these laws yet. While other states (like California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, New York and Washington) have adopted statutes that prohibit sexual harassment in the workplace and require certain employers to provide anti-harassment training, only a handful of states (such as California and New York) have gone as far as Texas to hold individual employees liable for harassment claims.
Recommendations and Best Practices
To help protect themselves from liability, employers can do the following:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJoining Effort to Beat Down NLRB, Amazon Suit Calls Agency's Administrative Process 'Constitutional Infirmity'
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 2'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 3'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
- 4NYSBA Annual Meeting: How In-House Counsel Navigate Gen AI Risk
- 5A Judge Ordered Squabbling Lawyers to Have Lunch: Here's What Happened
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250