McGinnis Lochridge's New Austin Digs Have Modern Design, Post-COVID Tech Updates
The midsize Texas firm moved on Monday into a totally refurbished building on the western edge of downtown at 1111 W. Sixth St.
September 30, 2021 at 12:12 PM
4 minute read
Real EstateFollowing trends for law office design, McGinnis Lochridge incorporated modern elements for its new Austin headquarters — think natural light and collaborative spaces — but also added features related to the pandemic, such as conference rooms with Zoom capability. Lawyers and staff at the midsize Texas firm moved into the space in a totally reconstructed building in the Market District of Austin on Monday — about two years after firm leaders started the process of determining if the firm should stay in its downtown location a few blocks from the Texas Capitol, or move elsewhere. It wasn't just about finding space that would be cost-effective, said managing partner Douglas Dodds, even though "the partners are pleased with the economic terms of the deal." A big incentive for building out modern, efficient offices was making it easier to recruit lawyers, said Cliff Ernst, a partner in Austin who chairs the firm's construction committee. "Recruiting is one of the things driving our design process," he said. "Doug and I were fine with the old space, but we aren't the target." Dodds said he's "always looking" to hire lawyers who are a good fit for the 69-lawyer firm's practices, which are litigation, corporate and transactions, electric energy, oil and gas, wealth preservation and estate planning, labor and employment, and land and water. "In the new space, looking for new lawyers is a top priority for us," he said. "We do fit a very good segment of the market. As a midsize firm, we've got better overhead than the big firms, our metrics are favorable compared with the big firms [and] more rate flexibility." The Austin hiring market is competitive, in part due to the number of out-of-state firms that have opened offices in Austin this year. According to Ernst, the new space and location is a "perfect fit" for the firm. The firm has the top two floors of the revamped South Building located at 1111 W. Sixth St. on the western edge of downtown, close to the Whole Foods headquarters. "We looked at the heart of downtown, looked at staying at 1 American Center, explored suburbs [and] looked at rental rates. ... We are right on the edge of downtown, still very centrally located, with great access to courts and the statehouse, but we are out of the congestion of downtown," he said. The office space features floor-to-ceiling glass windows, standard-sized 10-by-15 square foot offices for all lawyers but more conference space, an open floor plan, a large skylight in the main lobby, easy parking, a larger hospitality area, and a break room that overlooks the downtown skyline. The building also has an outdoor patio, Dodds said. The space is more efficient, Dodds said, at about 38,500 square feet total, down about 10,000 from the former space. The firm needed less space, because of smaller private offices and a significantly smaller library, Ernst said. The space has 53 exterior offices for lawyers — there are currently about 50 lawyers in Austin — but 27 interior offices are also available. That extra space will accommodate the hiring Dodds would like to do. The firm also has offices in Dallas, Houston and Decatur, Texas. One useful feature is an internal staircase between floors, which allows lawyers to collaborate more easily than in the prior building, where Dodds said lawyers had to get on an elevator and use their card keys. He also notes that the new design is "taking maximum advantage of technology" and a number of conference rooms are set up as Zoom hearing rooms. That's something the firm has used through the pandemic, he said, with trial lawyers participating in trials, depositions and hearings via Zoom. Dodds said the firm has not set a definite date to fully reopen following the pandemic, but he said a "fair number" of lawyers are coming in regularly, but some are still working remotely. "We don't have any requirements for lawyers. We have staff on what I call a hybrid schedule, again flexibility being the keyword. At the end of the day, your focus is taking care of your clients, and providing a safe work environment," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllReal Estate Attorney of the Year Finalist: John T. Duncan III
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250