![](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2021/12/container-ship-767x6332.jpg)
Time is Money: Allocating the Cost of Maritime Delays
In a competitive world where time is money, allocating the risk of delays between parties to maritime transportation contracts is more important than ever, and especially during a pandemic when vessels and container delays are rampant.
December 14, 2021 at 06:30 PM
7 minute read
Cargo and ShippingIt seems appropriate during this most unusual holiday season, when supply chains across the globe have suffered massive pandemic-induced traffic jams, to address how parties to maritime transportation contracts allocate the cost of delays to the movement of merchant ships and cargo. Merchant shipping is a capital-intensive industry that requires enormous financial commitments to build and operate the gargantuan container ships that everyone sees on the news these days at anchor off Southern California. Of course, those vessels are only part of the global merchant fleet, a third of which are tankers devoted to the carriage of crude oil and petroleum products. Still other vessels service offshore wind farms, carry grain, agricultural products and commodities like coal in bulk, transport liquified natural and petroleum gas, and fish the oceans, among other ventures. All told 90 percent of the world's goods are transported by sea.
Ordinarily, merchant ships transporting goods earn revenue by charging hire or freight to a charterer, who charters or leases a vessel for a set period or single voyage to carry either the charterer's cargo or the cargo of multiple shippers for whom the charterer in concert with the vessel owner acts as carrier. Charter hire is earned under a time charter (whether a vessel is delayed or not), while freight accrues under a voyage charter for the transportation of goods from point A to B. Vessels can be both time and voyage chartered. The contracting chain flows from head owner or bareboat charterer (literally a charterer who charters a vessel bare of a crew) to time charterer, and then perhaps to a voyage charterer and further to one or more sub-voyage charterers. In each case, either hire or freight is due to the party up the chain. When a vessel arrives at port, it tenders a Notice of Readiness (NOR), which triggers the start of the laytime-demurrage clock. Laytime is the amount of free time that the vessel owner (or upstream charterer) permits a downstream voyage charterer to load and unload its cargo. Once that laytime expires, demurrage accrues under a voyage charter at a set rate per day. Voyage charters often include various exceptions to the accrual of demurrage, for example, delays caused by port closures, vessel breakdowns, and weather. Disponent owners (that is, upstream bareboat and time charterers) and voyage charterers are often at odds about the amount of demurrage due and owing for delays encountered at ports of call, which can lead to either judicial or arbitral disputes. The factual permutations are nearly endless.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Maritime Law Column: When Is a Contract Maritime and Why Is That Important? Maritime Law Column: When Is a Contract Maritime and Why Is That Important?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2024/09/Container-Ship-767x633-2.jpg)
Maritime Law Column: When Is a Contract Maritime and Why Is That Important?
7 minute read![Maritime Law Column: Hurricanes and Their Cost on the Maritime Industry Maritime Law Column: Hurricanes and Their Cost on the Maritime Industry](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2024/07/Cargo-ships-767x633.jpg)
![Maritime Law Column: Texas Maritime Public Infrastructure Projects to Watch Maritime Law Column: Texas Maritime Public Infrastructure Projects to Watch](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2024/03/Miami-Port-767x633.jpg)
Maritime Law Column: Texas Maritime Public Infrastructure Projects to Watch
6 minute read![Maritime Law Column: The Legacy of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Maritime Law Column: The Legacy of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2024/01/oil-spill-767x633-1.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250