“The bar in a tort case for admission of evidence that a party was intoxicated or impaired, or a party suffered from a mental health condition is lower than many would imagine. If evidence raises a question about why a party acted as they did in connection with the occurrence and the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs any danger of unfair prejudice, the evidence probably is admissible at trial.”

Evidence that a party was intoxicated or impaired, or a party suffered from a mental health condition is not, in and of itself evidence that the party was negligent in causing an accident.  Instead, there must be some further evidence that the party’s intoxication, impairment or condition raises a question about why the party acted as they did in connection with the occurrence. And the probative value of the evidence must substantially outweigh any danger of unfair prejudice created by admission of the evidence.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]