A child’s environment can constitute a source of physical and emotional medical neglect. In the recent case of In the Interest of J.A.R.R., J.N.R., and M.A.R., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that termination of parental rights was warranted where parents had no plan in place to meet their children’s medical needs.
Where the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (TDFPS) seeks to terminate a parent’s rights, the case is one of constitutional proportion. Because of that, parents are entitled to due process to assure that the Department’s attempts to terminate the parent-child relationship is warranted. Appellate courts are charged with ensuring that TDFPS has met its significant burden of proof—by reviewing the record to confirm that TDFPS submitted clear and convincing evidence that a statutory ground was proffered to terminate parental rights, and further, that termination of parental rights serves the best interest of the children made the subject of the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
