![](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2022/11/Diverse-Workplace-767x633.jpg)
Work Is Life: Defining Your Law Firm Culture in 4 Steps
High-quality job-seekers are looking for firms that value culture, and this impacts the bottom line.
November 15, 2022 at 10:32 PM
4 minute read
Best PracticesLaw firm culture reflects the company's and its employees' attitudes and behaviors. Culture can be observed in the way people interact with each other, how they make decisions and the values they hold. The primary aspects of a company's culture are employee engagement, work environment and leadership style. However, a law firm's culture involves many combined and interwoven factors. Other factors contributing to its culture can include:
- Communication styles
- Time management and output expectations
- Career development opportunities
- Colleague social connections
Why Culture Matters to Law Firms
Nearly half of all job-seekers say company culture is an essential factor, and a culture that attracts high-caliber employees can result in a 33% revenue increase. Whether they realize it or not, every company has a culture. If a law firm isn't intentionally and proactively developing and defining its culture, it could become a negative culture.
Traditionally, the law firm culture is viewed as prestigious. Countless attorneys work tirelessly because they perceive that their law firm values competition and being overworked above all else. Unfortunately, work-life balance, personal satisfaction and equitable compensation fall by the wayside, even when the law firm doesn't intend it to be this way.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Troutman Pepper, Davis Polk Cases Put Partners' Feedback for Associates Under the Microscope Troutman Pepper, Davis Polk Cases Put Partners' Feedback for Associates Under the Microscope](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/405/2024/01/Giving-advice-01-767x633-1.jpg)
Troutman Pepper, Davis Polk Cases Put Partners' Feedback for Associates Under the Microscope
6 minute read![Best Practices: New Texas Law Mandates Audiovisual Recordings of Child Custody Interviews Best Practices: New Texas Law Mandates Audiovisual Recordings of Child Custody Interviews](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2023/08/Reiter-Pollack-Siegel_2-767x633.jpg)
Best Practices: New Texas Law Mandates Audiovisual Recordings of Child Custody Interviews
12 minute read![Articulating the Nuances of Defendants' Right to Self-Representation in Criminal Trials Articulating the Nuances of Defendants' Right to Self-Representation in Criminal Trials](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2021/10/Elisa-Reiter-and-Daniel-Pollack-767x6333.jpg)
Articulating the Nuances of Defendants' Right to Self-Representation in Criminal Trials
11 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250