The Thirteenth District Court of Appeals ruled a South Texas county court-at-law judge erred in assigning an attorney as umpire in a property damages dispute between a homeowner and an insurer.

The appeals court for the Corpus Christi and Rio Grande Valley region, in a response to a petition for writ of mandamus from State Farm Lloyds, instructed the trial court to vacate its appointment of the attorney tasked with representing the homeowner.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]